Southend RSS Feed


Amess's Commons Bill to end animal drugs testing

Amess's Commons Bill to end animal drugs testing Amess's Commons Bill to end animal drugs testing

DRUG testing using human tissue could prevent people being made seriously ill in clinical trials of new medicines, Southend West MP David Amess said yesterday.

Conservative Mr Amess said advances in technology could prevent “disasters” like one in which six men were hospitalised after an unsuccessful drugs trial.

The six suffered multiple organ failure after being given TGN1412, which was designed to treat rheumatoid arthritis, leukaemia and multiple sclerosis.

They were placed in intensive care and one sufferer was described as looking like “the Elephant Man” after the trial, which was conducted in 2006 by drug company Parexel, at Northwick Park Hospital, in north west London.

Mr Amess said new techniques, including new methods of administering minuscule amounts of a drug, could predict the effects of medicines “more accurately than animals ever can”.

This would remove the need for many forms of animal testing, for which there was an “ethical imperative”. His Safety of Medicines Bill would set up trials using drugs found to be dangerous to humans utilising the new methods and comparing them with existing animal tests.

Mr Amess told the House of Commons: “This will reveal which set of tests is more successful at predicting the safety of medicines in humans.”

His Bill, which has cross-party support, needs Government support to become law.

Comments(9)

Colleen G says...
8:57am Wed 21 Jul 10

Animal testing is cruel, uneccesary and vicious in the extreme. We should be questioning the ethics of the nuts who still push for it to continue!

"Of all the black crimes that Man commits against God and Creation, vivisection is the blackest."--Ghandi

gitreal says...
9:23am Wed 21 Jul 10

Why not test drugs on Amess instead of animals?

marshman says...
9:45am Wed 21 Jul 10

gitreal wrote:
Why not test drugs on Amess instead of animals?
Judging by his eyes in that picture they already have and there's no room for more.

purple rain says...
9:45am Wed 21 Jul 10

gitreal wrote:
Why not test drugs on Amess instead of animals?
hear hear and the rest of these greedy lazy politicians..great idea

karen29 says...
11:29am Wed 21 Jul 10

I think there would be a very long queue of people willing to experiment on welfare claimant Amess and his dysfunctional family.

jayman says...
12:31pm Wed 21 Jul 10

stop the testing of the drug (cake) on squirrels perhaps.. This man is a nut job who has no real agenda. i have never come across any of his policies that seem to make any real difference. (please southend) do not re-elect this useless man

remlap says...
12:34pm Wed 21 Jul 10

They should test on criminals, ie. murderers - someone with a life sentence. They deserve to be poked, prodded and what not for years on end

remlap says...
12:34pm Wed 21 Jul 10

They should test on criminals, ie. murderers - someone with a life sentence. They deserve to be poked, prodded and what not for years on end

MichaelK says...
2:42pm Mon 26 Jul 10

More than 90 percent of drugs tested safe and effective in animals fail human trials, and over half of those that are approved later get relabeled or pulled from the market. Unfortunately, failure rates are increasing. Repeatedly, drugs such the diabetes drug Avandia are relabeled or withdrawn after they are found to cause serious human harm, despite testing safe in animals. Nonanimal alternative testing methods, including human tissue cultures, can more effectively predict potential risks of drugs to humans.

click2find

Most popular