Southend RSS Feed


David Amess MP forces release of Essex abortion figures


NEWLY-RELEASED figures from the county’s health trusts reveal for the first time the number of Essex women who have had abortions.

The figures have been published in response to pressure from Southend West MP David Amess, a prominent Roman Catholic, who wants the abortion law tightened.

“If a woman feels an abortion is in her best interests, she should have access to safe, supportive and non-judgmental advice and help from an expert. We always support a woman’s right to choose .”

Amanda Barlow, of NHS South West Essex

Across the whole of Essex, 5,438 women and girls had abortions in 2008 – with 110 girls under 16 and 535 under 18 opting for the procedure.

Broken down by primary care trust area, the figures show more than twice as many women in south west Essex had terminations than in the north east of the county.

NHS South West Essex cares for a total of 420,000 patients in the Basildon district and Thurrock and Brentwood boroughs. It performed 1,611 abortions in 2008, the most of any Essex trust area. The trust also reported the highest number of terminations for girls under 16 – a total of 36.

The second highest number of underage girls having abortions was in NHS South East Essex’s area, covering Rochford district and Southend and Castle Point boroughs. Some 24 girls under 15 had terminations.

The trust, which cares for about 342,500 patients, recorded the third highest overall number of abortions, 1,048, only slightly fewer than the West Essex trust total of 1,087.

The figures were collated and published in response to a written Parliamentary question by MP David Amess, a father-of-five, who wants the 24-week legal abortion limit to be lowered,.

He said: “I think the figures speak for themselves. My views on abortion are a matter of public record since I was first elected to Parliament. I much regret when any abortion is necessary, let alone the huge numbers which are carried out today.”

Trusts record statistics by age group and NHS South West Essex figures show the greatest number of women having abortions last year were aged between 19 and 22.

Amanda Barlow, trust spokes-man, stresses the totals have to be considered in the context of a large overall patient-base. She said: “To compare these figures accurately, they need to be expressed in terms of the number of abortions per 1,000 women.

“When you compare the number of abortions per 1,000 women aged 15 to 44, NHS South West Essex has a ratio of 18.8 in every 1,000, compared to the national average of 17.8 in every 1,000. Compared in these terms, the figures for South West Essex are not the highest in Essex.”

Using the same yardstick, South East Essex had a rate of 18 terminations for every 1,000 female residents aged 15 to 44.

But NHS South East Essex points out its most recent figures for women conceiving under the age of 18 show a pronounced reduction – down 26 per cent since 1998.

The trust is now offering contraceptive and sexual health advice six days a week, plus help with contraceptives. It is also encouraging young people not to start having sex too young.

Chris Clark, Southend’s teenage pregnancy co-ordinator, said: “We are doing our best to make sure we cut the number of unwanted pregnancies, but we want to make sure young people know they have a choice. Teenagers have options. We need to see them early to support them and help them make their decision. Just as important is to make sure they get the right sort of contraception.”

Next month, secondary schools across the county will play host to plays and workshops, aimed at sending out the right messages about unprotected casual sex, the risks of unprotected sex and relationships in general.

In Southend, the Focus youth centre, in Short Street, is hosting drop-in sessions to encourage young people to get information on safer sex and access to health services.

While accepting prevention is the best option, health authorities are keen to emphasise if a woman decides to have an abortion, she deserves support.

Amanda Barlow, of NHS South West Essex, added: “If a woman feels an abortion is in her best interests, she should have access to safe, supportive and non-judgmental advice and help from an expert. We always support a woman’s right to choose .”


Your Say Your Southend

evilc, essex says...
12:16pm Fri 26 Jun 09

“If a woman feels an abortion is in her best interests, she should have access to safe, supportive and non-judgmental advice and help from an expert. We always support a woman’s right to choose .”All those naughty girls in Essex!

Is it really a surprise?

With regard to David Amess wanting the abortion law tightened WHO IS THIS MAN?

Winston Smith, Airstrip One. Oceania. says...
1:16pm Fri 26 Jun 09

This is why people like David Amess, with their 'strong religious convictions' should NOT be allowed to enter politics. How can he debate this subject objectively when he is slave to thinking what unelected people in Rome tell him to think?

woody88, Southend says...
3:00pm Fri 26 Jun 09

Amess just pursues the interests of his own RC beliefs rather than those he was elected to represent.

He's also obsessed with anti-semitism - he's been asking loads of written questions about it to ministers. Is he pursuing the interests of a big Jewish organisation?

He's a part of Conservative Friends of Israel, I know that much.

wotsit, southend says...
3:53pm Fri 26 Jun 09

Maybe some of these women would have benefitted from some moral/religious instructions when they were younger. I would wager that there are few women that feel really good about themselves after having an abortion.

Karin Smith, says...
4:09pm Fri 26 Jun 09

I'm sorry David but being a catholic, does not make you the ideal person to put an objective argument forward in Parliament on this subject.

A woman has the right to choose, whatever her age. How dare you try to impinge upon those existing rights. Perhaps you ought to be looking at your own ethics as an MP, instead of trying to enforce RC beliefs across a multicultural Britain.

wotsit, southend says...
4:53pm Fri 26 Jun 09

Karin, If a woman has such a right to an abortion then they can pay for it themselves. Why should I have to contribute to the product of immoral behaviour. (Now where did I put that wooden spoon)

Karin Smith, says...
5:51pm Fri 26 Jun 09

Wotsit....

What if the woman can't afford it? Tax payers will pay for it either way. Which is the cheaper, an abortion of an unwanted child or paying benefits when the child is born?

The last thing needed, is a reversion to illegal back street abortions.

Here's your spoon!

Soozie, Southend on sea says...
6:51pm Fri 26 Jun 09

Karin Smith wrote:
Wotsit.... What if the woman can't afford it? Tax payers will pay for it either way. Which is the cheaper, an abortion of an unwanted child or paying benefits when the child is born? The last thing needed, is a reversion to illegal back street abortions. Here's your spoon!
Right on!Lets not forget that 15% of all single parent families have never worked, absent fathers etc etc.


Karin Smith, says...
8:21pm Fri 26 Jun 09

So abortion would be the cheaper option then.

wotsit, southend says...
1:36am Sat 27 Jun 09

Why should I have to contribute to either an abortion or a single parent family. Why is it that women of moral standing costs the country a lot less than those without. And if you want to give me the spoon back, there have been 5,438 state sponsered baby murders in 2008, is that not enough. I see a need for some moral standing and you do not, typical ESSEX girl.

wotsit, southend says...
2:07am Sat 27 Jun 09

Soozie wrote:
Karin Smith wrote:
Wotsit.... What if the woman can't afford it? Tax payers will pay for it either way. Which is the cheaper, an abortion of an unwanted child or paying benefits when the child is born? The last thing needed, is a reversion to illegal back street abortions. Here's your spoon!
Right on!Lets not forget that 15% of all single parent families have never worked, absent fathers etc etc.

Right on! Lets not forget that;....this conversation is out of your depth

Karin Smith, says...
2:31am Sat 27 Jun 09

"I see a need for some moral standing and you do not, typical ESSEX girl."

Assumption is for fools Wotsit.

I'm a 58 year old economist, born in Germany and brought up in Switzerland and Chelsea, London. As for my morals? Married 25 years with 2 adult children. One of which died in 2006. I also personally don't believe in abortion.

However, as an economist, I view the abortion option as cheaper for the state. If you had bothered to read the post properly, you would have understood that.

As a taxpayer, you will contribute whether you like it or not. Be it for improved education of these young people, abortions or welfare payments to bring these single parent's children up. That is a simple economic fact of life in today's society. Change takes time after having 12 years of a Labour Government.

What is required, is better education at an early age. Before we end up with a further generation of young single Mums living off the state in the future. Until such time, your taxes will continue to pay for these young Mums.

Karin Smith, says...
2:46am Sat 27 Jun 09

Perhaps my debate is far above your head Wotsit. Never mind.

Soozie, Southend on sea says...
6:01am Sat 27 Jun 09

Karin Smith wrote:
Perhaps my debate is far above your head Wotsit. Never mind.
wotsit isn't the smartest of people Karin.

He is quite hypocritical. Never adds much to any thread. Best ignored

jayman, southend says...
9:41am Sat 27 Jun 09

i dont etierly belive in abortion. but i dont want women to be alone when they most need help. unlike some roman catholic nut jobs out there that think that woman should still have babies at the edge of the village.

(If you belive there is a man who lives in the clouds) who disagrees with parents having unwanted childeren they cant support or love then you have no place in politics or policy making. just look at the state of this contry there are plenty of people out there that should never have been parents. I support woman who say now isant right for them.

wotsit, southend says...
1:10pm Sat 27 Jun 09

Karen, abortion is not a matter of choice, it's a matter of life and how we value life. Having the freedom to choose whether or not an unborn person is to be killed is not a right which can be justified morally or legally. No person has the right to destroy the life of another person. The decline of the church and moral guidance shows in the abortion figures. Sounds like you spent too much time with the Deutsche Wehrmacht. Send my regards to the Fuhrer. p.s your mate who cant spell susie, thick as pig s**t

Karin Smith, says...
2:27pm Sat 27 Jun 09

Wotsit - Ein Mann, jetzt verstehe ich die dummen Anmerkungen!


Karin Smith, says...
2:52pm Sat 27 Jun 09

Thank you Soozie, explains everything.

Jayman, exactly my thoughts. As an MP. you must set aside personal religious beliefs. Especially when dealing with such a contentious issue.



Karin Smith, says...
2:59pm Sat 27 Jun 09

A quote I live by...

"Yes, you are right - I am a moralist in disguise; it gets me into heaps of trouble when I go thrashing around in political questions."

Mark Twain

wotsit, southend says...
3:32pm Sat 27 Jun 09

Karin Smith wrote:
A quote I live by...

"Yes, you are right - I am a moralist in disguise; it gets me into heaps of trouble when I go thrashing around in political questions."

Mark Twain
This is why you are confused

Winston Smith, Airstrip One. Oceania. says...
5:02pm Sat 27 Jun 09

The biggest problem facing the planet today is overpopulation. There are simply too many human beings. The Earth cannot support such a large population.

Overpopulation is the issue which MUST be addressed or everything else, recycling, energy efficiency, pollution reduction, is just a waste of time.

Any measure designed to increase population is a retrograde step. It is backward religions, such as Catholicism, which outlaw contraception, which are responsible for overpopulation. Look at all the poorest countries in the western hemisphere, all Catholic, with massive ghettos outside their cities, HIV running rampant, people living in shanty towns, feral children living in sewers.

Poverty, starvation, disease. Those are the results of banning contraception and banning abortion.

jayman, southend says...
5:46pm Sat 27 Jun 09

here are the facts.

MR amess ((there is no i repeat NO GOD))

its just us im afraid alone on this planet revolving around in the void of space at an amazing speed.

we make our own decisions and choices based on the variables we encounter on a daily basis. We are accountable for our actions WE are subject to our own rule. oh and wotsit. i have two beautiful childeren and one on the way. Despite my own views i think abortion should be a right to all women. without god or any of that nonsense. we as a people have grown and we dont need childlike constructs to hold onto anymore (so leave morality out of it) whats immoral is banging out 16 kids you cant afford to feed clothe or care for..

Hobnail, Benfleet says...
10:30am Sun 28 Jun 09

No contraception is 100%
Girls you are far too easy! Guys you have no respect!
Amess you are just that!

Don South, says...
10:47am Wed 1 Jul 09

wotsit wrote:
Karen, abortion is not a matter of choice, it's a matter of life and how we value life. Having the freedom to choose whether or not an unborn person is to be killed is not a right which can be justified morally or legally. No person has the right to destroy the life of another person. The decline of the church and moral guidance shows in the abortion figures. Sounds like you spent too much time with the Deutsche Wehrmacht. Send my regards to the Fuhrer. p.s your mate who cant spell susie, thick as pig s**t
My wife had an abortion. It is one of those amongst these statistict.

The skull and brain of our unborn child had failed to form. It would not have survived outside the womb. Being born would have killed it.

We had no choice.

You state "...Having the freedom to choose whether or not an unborn person is to be killed is not a right which can be justified morally or legally. No person has the right to destroy the life of another person."

So what would your solution have been?

Comments are closed on this article.

Choices – teenage pregnancy co-ordinator Chris Clark Choices - teenage pregnancy co-ordinator Chris Clark

Local Advertisers

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »