Southend andlords permit scheme in doubt

CONTROVERSIAL plans to introduce permits for Southend’s landlords are set to be scrapped.

After 18 months of bitter debate, bosses at Southend Council are expected to sound the death knell for the controversial selective licensing scheme when they meet next week.

The idea, which would have required property owners to pay up to £600 per home before they could rent it out, has divided residents and landlords.

When it was first proposed in January 2011, the scheme, designed to ensure both accommodation and tenants met a minimum standard, was widely backed by councillors and residents who were fed up with antisocial behaviour in their streets.

But, with threats of legal challenges ringing in their ears, council chiefs have now recommended the project is shelved for at least a year.

In its place, landlords have suggested a compromise system which would require them to regulate themselves under the banner of a new organisation – the South East Alliance of Landlords, Agents and Residents.

Tony Prior, the chairman of the alliance, said: “We have put forward a proposal which we hope the council will accept.

“It will allow us to deal with the issues which selective licensing was supposed to tackle, but in a less confrontational way.

“We want to work with the council, not against it.”

At the moment, only shared houses with three or more storeys, two or more separate households of at least five people, have to be licensed. Landlords who had certain criminal convictions, previous poor management records or had ignored council demands to maintain their homes could have been rejected, leaving them unable to let to tenants.

Jacqui Lansley, the council’s head of community strategy and development, said: “The proposal will improve relationships between the council and landlords, while minimising risk to the council and achieving the bulk of the objectives of licensing.”

Comments(13)

westcliffboy says...
11:03am Fri 15 Jun 12

Disgraceful retreat by the Council. In the face of "possisble legal challenge" they back down, after doing a huge amount of work, spending many thousands of our pounds.

The private landlords ran an intense lobbying campaign, and of course some of our Councillors are also private landlords....

The private landlords run Southend's housing policy - not the Council. Just take a look at the many rented units in westcliff, either side of London Road. Most of them are private, most of them are rundown, and once you get inside, you can see years of neglect, below standard space, rubbish sotorage areas, etc etc.

Yet the Council, if it was serious, could deal with a lot of these issues with the powers it already has - yet chooses to turn a blind eye.

Southend should be renamed Shameful.

freecomment says...
11:29am Fri 15 Jun 12

So landlords can regulate themselves can they - I don't think so! There are some excellent landlords, but in a minority I fear. Looks like the bad ones will be able to pay a small fee, join the 'Alliance' and carry on as they were, neglect their property, just collect the rent from whoever is willing to pay, don't vet prospective tenants thoroughly yet under the blanket of the 'Alliance' will somehow gain a certain 'professional credibility'. Maybe there will be an alliance logo they can use on their stationary as well - that should do it!

The state of many rental properties in the Southend district is an absolute disgrace as are some of the tenants it has to be said. Southend Council acting like a bunch of wimps again! They had the chance to clean things up, regulate the industry locally, but don't want to rock the boat. I wonder why?

LisaWOS says...
1:16pm Fri 15 Jun 12

Just want to say - that I have heard - that of your area is chosen to take part in selective licensing then it means an increase in home and car insurance As it is naturally presumed that the area is full of undesirables and therefore vandalism and theft are likely to happen. So I am happy that it's been opposed.

notinwestcliffanymore says...
3:17pm Fri 15 Jun 12

I wholly agree with two of the points above. lisa the point of selective licensing is that most of the high rental ares in southend ARE full of undesirables and need to be brought up to a certain standard.

jolllyboy says...
4:59pm Fri 15 Jun 12

Disgraceful. Why does it not surprise me that they just arnt bothered how the town can deteriorate. Since once in ruins they can force a knock down and rebuild.

Ivanna Goodhump says...
6:53pm Fri 15 Jun 12

The plans for this scheme were flawed from the start. It's typical and lazy of a Council that they proposed to attempt to regulate everyone (at some expense) good or bad. All that would happen is that all the good landlords would obey the law and the bad ones would ignore it like they do everything else.
~
The Council currently has plenty of exisiting powers to deal with shoddy or poor landlords but they choose (for some inexplicable reason) not to use them or do anything about it/them. One only has to look at the longstanding issues with the towerblocks and drug dealing/antisocial tenants in Southend to show how little the Council really cares - and these are the Councils own tenants.
~
What should happen is that if a landlord attracts continual complaints that are upheld after thorough investigation then they should be blacklisted and no future tenant claiming benefit should be able to claim housing benefit for that address until matters are resolved.
~
The balance should also be that Landlords can report bad tenants (and there are many) who in turn should then be ineligible to claim housing benefit to rent any property should the complaint be upheld.

v.randy says...
9:44pm Fri 15 Jun 12

More proof that the real power in our society lies with landlords,property developers.
We have made it too easy and profitable for the above to just carve up the housing market.Neither of the above care about our community or care about maintenance ...houses are just cash cows

The Cater Wood Creeper says...
11:40am Sat 16 Jun 12

Southend andlords


what's an 'andlord'? is it a cross between Jeffrey Archer and Marvin the paranoid android?

jayman says...
5:25pm Sat 16 Jun 12

its okay SBC.

half the properties around Southend are rotting away and the poor tenants are needlessly living in damp, mouldy and sometimes dangerous conditions while the landlords get there nest egg paid for, mostly due to (working) housing benefit (top up) tenants who could never afford the rents on basic minimum wage..

if the government paid mortgage top ups at the same rate to people on low incomes 'instead of to the benefit of greedy and unscrupulous landlords' then people would have more pride in there streets and communities as they would own a stake in there own street.

if you work hard for a living on low pay why shouldn't you have a chance of buying a place with the same fiducial support you would receive if you rented one of southends many dumps..

jayman says...
5:29pm Sat 16 Jun 12

jayman wrote:
its okay SBC.

half the properties around Southend are rotting away and the poor tenants are needlessly living in damp, mouldy and sometimes dangerous conditions while the landlords get there nest egg paid for, mostly due to (working) housing benefit (top up) tenants who could never afford the rents on basic minimum wage..

if the government paid mortgage top ups at the same rate to people on low incomes 'instead of to the benefit of greedy and unscrupulous landlords' then people would have more pride in there streets and communities as they would own a stake in there own street.

if you work hard for a living on low pay why shouldn't you have a chance of buying a place with the same fiducial support you would receive if you rented one of southends many dumps..
sorry. typo. 'fiducial' should have been 'financial'

Lefty Cyclist Type says...
5:33pm Sat 16 Jun 12

Typical of Southend Clowncil to look at 'self regulation' for landlords.

We've all seen how well self-regulation works with the press, MPs' expenses, police complaints etc. Allowing Southend's slumlords to self-regulate is a preposterous idea.

bignosechaff says...
7:54am Sun 17 Jun 12

The council should put a cap on the ridiculous rents that landlords charge. And stop buy to rent that is helping to kill the property market. And help first time buyers get on the property ladder.

bigboy57 says...
4:55pm Mon 18 Jun 12

landlord thing that rat down essex st still operating sue me you rat faced a!!!rse

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree