Housing estate plan is a no-go

Housing estate plan is a no-go

Housing estate plan is a no-go

First published in Echo News

CALLS to transfer a massive housing estate to Basildon Council’s control to ease pressures on Wickford have fallen on deaf ears.

Ukip councillor for Wickford Castledon, Nigel Le Gresley, had suggested that the Runwell Homes site, to the north of Wickford, which falls under Chelmsford City Council’s control, could be transferred into Basildon Council’s ownership.

The site already has outline planning permission and Mr Le Gresley claims it could be included in Basildon’s Local Housing Plan instead of one of four proposed Wickford sites, totalling 2,800 homes.

However, the idea was quashed at last Thursday’s full council meeting, when the Tory authority’s leader claimed that because the Runwell homes are already on Chelmsford’s Local Plan, which has been ratified, it will not happen.

Mr Le Gresley said one of the four Wickford sites is very close to where the 575 new Runwell homes are to be built.

He said: “The impact on Wickford is unreasonably increased.

“At the very least, the Runwell development should enable the council to justify removing 150 north east Wickford homes from its plans as there is a danger of merging with Runwell.

“It should also be able to justify reducing the number of homes required for Wickford and the borough by arguing the needs of the borough and Wickford would be satisfied pro rata by this 575 home Runwell development.”

The Runwell Homes development, which will take place in six phases, was given planning permission last year.

The first phase is expected to start in the next few months.

Tony Ball, whose Wickford North seat is up for grabs on May 22, said: “Whether or not I agree, it does not matter because it cannot happen.

“We had an in-depth consultation with residents and they preferred homes over a prison there.”

Malcolm Buckley, the Tory councillor for Wickford Castledon, attacked Ukip, claiming Mr Le Gresley does not have any proposals as to where the 2,800 Wickford homes could go elsewhere in the borough.

The group is against building the homes in Wickford, claiming the town is at bursting point.

Mr Buckley said: “Their proposals to restrict development in the borough are an absolute nonsense, so should be treated like the sham they are.”

Comments (5)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

1:41pm Wed 7 May 14

pembury53 says...

must stick in the throat, for wickford dwellers, knowing billericay residents wont be choking on their foie gras.....
must stick in the throat, for wickford dwellers, knowing billericay residents wont be choking on their foie gras..... pembury53
  • Score: 6

3:49pm Wed 7 May 14

black jack ketchum says...

of course Chelmsford wouldn't want to do this, having their house building allowance built in another town suits them just fine!
of course Chelmsford wouldn't want to do this, having their house building allowance built in another town suits them just fine! black jack ketchum
  • Score: 6

7:26pm Wed 7 May 14

Nebs says...

Essex is full. Build in some of the counties with lower population densities.
Essex is full. Build in some of the counties with lower population densities. Nebs
  • Score: 3

10:43am Thu 8 May 14

Howard Cháse says...

Nebs wrote:
Essex is full. Build in some of the counties with lower population densities.
I think it's time that the Government put plans for a series of New Towns to be built in less populated areas. With the upcoming HS2, Crossrail and other transport projects there will be ample opportunities for commuting into London etc.

The existing infrastructure in this area is wlready struggling to cope with the population increases and the pressures that that brings.
[quote][p][bold]Nebs[/bold] wrote: Essex is full. Build in some of the counties with lower population densities.[/p][/quote]I think it's time that the Government put plans for a series of New Towns to be built in less populated areas. With the upcoming HS2, Crossrail and other transport projects there will be ample opportunities for commuting into London etc. The existing infrastructure in this area is wlready struggling to cope with the population increases and the pressures that that brings. Howard Cháse
  • Score: 1

1:23pm Thu 8 May 14

pembury53 says...

Howard Cháse wrote:
Nebs wrote: Essex is full. Build in some of the counties with lower population densities.
I think it's time that the Government put plans for a series of New Towns to be built in less populated areas. With the upcoming HS2, Crossrail and other transport projects there will be ample opportunities for commuting into London etc. The existing infrastructure in this area is wlready struggling to cope with the population increases and the pressures that that brings.
most of essex is actually more or less empty, it's the thames corridor thats chocker block, so only idiots, or corrupt idiots would suggest building there.... oh hang on
[quote][p][bold]Howard Cháse[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Nebs[/bold] wrote: Essex is full. Build in some of the counties with lower population densities.[/p][/quote]I think it's time that the Government put plans for a series of New Towns to be built in less populated areas. With the upcoming HS2, Crossrail and other transport projects there will be ample opportunities for commuting into London etc. The existing infrastructure in this area is wlready struggling to cope with the population increases and the pressures that that brings.[/p][/quote]most of essex is actually more or less empty, it's the thames corridor thats chocker block, so only idiots, or corrupt idiots would suggest building there.... oh hang on pembury53
  • Score: 1

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree