Councillors declare business expertise

Southend Standard: Councillors declare business expertise Councillors declare business expertise

COUNCILLORS have hit back at a property developer who accused them of knowing nothing about business.

Complaining about an obligation to include affordable homes in housing developments in Westcliff and Leigh, Brian Strickland, managing director of Sandhurst New Homes, said Southend councillors “had no idea about business”.

But members of the council’s development control committee, the cross-party group of councillors who imposed the conditions, have defended their business knowledge. All 17 members of the committee confirmed they had business experience and then took it in turns to list it on Wednesday.

Chairman David Norman took the unusual step of addressing Mr Strickland’s accusation and called for those who’d had experience to raise their hands. The declaration was held at the start of the committee’s meeting, which was held in public at the town’s Civic Centre.

He said: “I hope members of the public find that interesting.

“At the end of the day they will have to judge if this committee has knowledge of business or not.”

Mr Strickland made the accusation in the Echo last Friday.

Sandhurst New Homes has permission to build more than 100 flats at 53 Pavilion Drive, Leigh, the former Shell garage on London Road, Westcliff, 845-849 London Road, Chalkwell, 86-104 Salisbury Avenue, Westcliff, and 211-213 North Road, Westcliff.

It is using new Government legislation to apply to remove all the affordable housing conditions, known as section 106 agreements, attached to the plans.

The company says a changing economic climate means the schemes will not be viable with the conditions attached due to the economy.

The councillors experience included Paul Van Looy, who owned a string of fish and chip shops, Chris Walker, who was a company director, Ted Lewin, who is a marketing manager and hotelier Alex Kaye.

Some of the councillors, who are meant to represent the common man and not meant to be experts in any particular field, rallied against the call to justify their role.

Mike Assenheim, who was managing director of an import and export business, said: “I don’t know why we should justify ourselves to this man’s disingenuous comments.”

Mike Grimwade, who has held a number of positions, said: “If you sit on a jury you’re accepted just for yourself.”

Comments (5)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

2:45pm Mon 16 Dec 13

jayman says...

We don't vote in councillors for the business acumen. We vote in councillors for their sense of social justice and general judgement.

So Brian Strickland. If you don't like democracy and the principles of community, then you have no business in trying to develop areas within it for your own financial betterment.
We don't vote in councillors for the business acumen. We vote in councillors for their sense of social justice and general judgement. So Brian Strickland. If you don't like democracy and the principles of community, then you have no business in trying to develop areas within it for your own financial betterment. jayman

6:44pm Mon 16 Dec 13

Nebs says...

It would seem to be Brian Strickland who is lacking in business expertise. The way property prices have shot up locally in the last few months, if he can't make a profit from 100 flats then he should sell the land to someone who can.
It would seem to be Brian Strickland who is lacking in business expertise. The way property prices have shot up locally in the last few months, if he can't make a profit from 100 flats then he should sell the land to someone who can. Nebs

6:51pm Mon 16 Dec 13

Tich25 says...

Well of course the Council will blackmail a Developer into building houses that will not make a profit as Councils cant build houses themselves Government wont let them
Well of course the Council will blackmail a Developer into building houses that will not make a profit as Councils cant build houses themselves Government wont let them Tich25

7:29pm Mon 16 Dec 13

abd123 says...

The economic climate is such that flat price rises are far ahead of any rise in land and building costs. For better or worse it is Government policy to provide affordable housing in developments and not the Council blackmailing anybody. The more people are property owners the fairer society will be. The ordinary people who nurse our old, sweep our streets or do ordinary low paid jobs shouldn't be left behind.
The economic climate is such that flat price rises are far ahead of any rise in land and building costs. For better or worse it is Government policy to provide affordable housing in developments and not the Council blackmailing anybody. The more people are property owners the fairer society will be. The ordinary people who nurse our old, sweep our streets or do ordinary low paid jobs shouldn't be left behind. abd123

9:02pm Mon 16 Dec 13

jayman says...

abd123 wrote:
The economic climate is such that flat price rises are far ahead of any rise in land and building costs. For better or worse it is Government policy to provide affordable housing in developments and not the Council blackmailing anybody. The more people are property owners the fairer society will be. The ordinary people who nurse our old, sweep our streets or do ordinary low paid jobs shouldn't be left behind.
"The more people are property owners the fairer society will be."

hmm. that sentence sums up every housing boom/bust we have ever had and every finacial crash there in after.
No. home ownership (in today's market) would not create a farer society. It would just create an indebted one...
[quote][p][bold]abd123[/bold] wrote: The economic climate is such that flat price rises are far ahead of any rise in land and building costs. For better or worse it is Government policy to provide affordable housing in developments and not the Council blackmailing anybody. The more people are property owners the fairer society will be. The ordinary people who nurse our old, sweep our streets or do ordinary low paid jobs shouldn't be left behind.[/p][/quote]"The more people are property owners the fairer society will be." hmm. that sentence sums up every housing boom/bust we have ever had and every finacial crash there in after. No. home ownership (in today's market) would not create a farer society. It would just create an indebted one... jayman

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree