Burges Estate covenant set to be lifted after eight-year battle

Burges Estate Residents' Association members Mike Taylor, Ian Murdoch, Peter Lindford, Mike Stafford, Peter Lovett, David Harper, David Gordon, Ron Woodley and Philippa Peters Burges Estate Residents' Association members Mike Taylor, Ian Murdoch, Peter Lindford, Mike Stafford, Peter Lovett, David Harper, David Gordon, Ron Woodley and Philippa Peters

BATTLING residents can at last quash a legal condition which has been used to demand up to £50,000 for permission to alter their homes.

After an eight-year battle, Thorpe Estate Ltd is preparing to offer families of the Burges Estate - which stretches from Southchurch to Shoebury - a chance to buy their freeholds and lift a restrictive covenant which allows the firm to charge for permitting changes.

Burges Estate Residents’ Association, which represents more than half of the 1,800-home estate, voted overwhelmingly in favour of accepting a draft offer for leaseholders to buy their free hold, complete with covenant, for £1,500 - while current free holders can lift the restriction by forking out £750.

Cheers and applause rang through St Augustine’s Church, Thorpe Bay, as members backed the proposal, which was emailed to Mr Woodley just 90 minutes before the meeting, which was attended by about 250 people.

Chairman Ron Woodley said: “This gets rid of the risks and all the uncertainty.

“For generations to come, people living on the estate will be free of the festering sore of these covenants.”

Thorpe Estate Ltd’s board of directors, which wanted to ensure a majority of residents would take up the offer before making it official, will now vote to approve it.

Letters will then go out to every household, offering them the buy-out option.

Comments(4)

yaymar says...
8:24am Sat 9 Mar 13

About time too!!! That rule was a disgusting and very unfair one. I don't live in that area but I know how I would feel if I had to pay someone extra money just to make changes to my home that other home owners can do without an extra charge.

RobertFS says...
1:33pm Sat 9 Mar 13

everyone knows that the people behind these companies are 'related' to rackman.
don't cross them if you don't want trouble

eddicaine says...
3:58pm Sun 10 Mar 13

Why buy in the first place? I'm sure their solicitors would have warned them of this lease when buying

gordonbennet says...
10:15am Mon 11 Mar 13

eddicaine wrote:
Why buy in the first place? I'm sure their solicitors would have warned them of this lease when buying
Yes, purchasers would have been informed that the freeholder can make a 'reasonable' charge for administration. But they were making demands for many thousands of pounds to allow people to renew old windows, renew garden fences and walls, even make minor internal alterations like moving a doorway. Clearly this is not reasonable and has lead to the decision they have now made.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree