Southend needs new shopping district, say planners (From Southend Standard)
Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting ECHONEWS to 80360, or email us Click here for details »
Southend needs new shopping district, say planners
6:00am Friday 4th January 2013 in Echo News
The planned retail park at Fossetts Farm
SOUTHEND desperately needs a new shopping district, according to planners behind the Blues’ maligned Fossetts Farm project.
Experts at Savills, which has been hired by Southend United to fight its corner over the controversial scheme, claim the town centre is currently “over trading”.
The club’s plans to build a new out-of-town retail park at Fossetts, alongside a 22,000-seater stadium, have been cast into disarray after councillors demanded to see more evidence that the development would not harm town centre shops.
But, in a report for Southend Council planners, a spokesman for Savills said the case for a new retail park was overwhelming.
He added: “There is a significant and immediate need for additional retail floorspace within Southend.
“In light of the level of expenditure and minimal level of trade diversion from the town centre, it cannot be a credible case that the proposal will have a significant adverse impact (on the town centre).”
The Fossetts plans appeared before the council’s development control committee earlier this month.
The Blues needed approval to renew the planning permission they first secured in 2008, and also asked the authority to scrap an agreed £6million contribution to protect the town centre from the new retail park.
But councillors rejected both requests, deferring a decision until March so more evidence could be produced.
Savills’ claims are based on a trading survey conducted by the council last year, in which it claims Southend’s retailers sell £9,200 worth of goods per square metre every year.
It points out that is much higher than the benchmark level of £6,500 prescribed by the authority.
But GL Hearn, a consultant hired by the council to assess Savills’ conclusions, said there was no evidence of such “over trading” in reality.
A spokesman said: “We would have anticipated that the higher level of trading identified would have been corroborated with on the ground evidence, such as how busy the town centre actually is and demand from new retailers to gain a presence in the town centre.
“The health check of Southend does not indicate any such over trading stress which would, in our view, suggest there is a need to plan to relieve pressure by making new floorspace.”
Comments(24)
ayoungie1
says...
8:29am Fri 4 Jan 13
Victoria Circus is empty......
Sensible Man
says...
8:32am Fri 4 Jan 13
fletch12107
says...
8:39am Fri 4 Jan 13
Carnabackable
says...
9:29am Fri 4 Jan 13
sosad 1
says...
11:59am Fri 4 Jan 13
mys842
says...
12:01pm Fri 4 Jan 13
urch/Wakering area.
marshman
says...
12:16pm Fri 4 Jan 13
Then they get consultants in to compile a report that says there's no evidence of that 'on the ground'.
I think they should get consultants in to compile a report that tells them consultant's report aren't worth the paper they're written on.
Carnabackable
says...
12:24pm Fri 4 Jan 13
sosad 1 wrote:Ah the sky high rates, the high cost of parking - YEAH LETS RUSH TO SOUTHEND, loads of bargains, loads of choice, wow
vi c plaza check the rent and rates no way, high st check the car parking rates its sbc golden cash cow it keeps the councilers snouts in the trough
Tom from Southend
says...
12:47pm Fri 4 Jan 13
sjreynolds143
says...
2:17pm Fri 4 Jan 13
mys842 wrote:Ah yes.
I disagree. The type of shops attracted to retail parks are entirely different to those on the high street. Look around at other parks, the airport one, the numerous Thurrock ones and even the existing shops around Fossets way. They are never empty, people are always in those shops yet they're not detracting from High Street trade. I for one would be very happy to bring more shops towards the Thorpe Bay/Shoebury/Southch
urch/Wakering area.
Airport Trading Estate - PC World, closed.
Fossets - Comet, closed.
The airport estate is only busy because it has Macdonalds. And when did you ever see the B&Q car park full? Maplin isn't exactly heaving, either.
SBC should stick to their guns. The extra cash could rejuvenate the High Street, if only by making car parking free for a few years!
emcee
says...
3:20pm Fri 4 Jan 13
The rents and rates in the centre of Southend (inc. Vic Shopping Centre) are extreme to the point of extrotionate. Very few businesses, especially small, independent businesses, would even consider the High St or the town centre shopping centres, especially when other factors are taken into consideration like the high parking costs and high public transport costs for their customers. And here lies the propblem.
Out of town shopping centres are fine and will rarely impact on the town centres if the town centres were opened up to the independent trader with low rents, rates and cheap fares and parking to attract the customers. This will leave the larger, chain stores to use the out of town retail parks and, thus, a happy balance is created.
There is no way on this earth that a new retail park will damage the town centre as it is. The council need to take their blinkers off and realise that the thing killing the town centre are the high rents, rates, parking and public transport costs, not out of town retail parks.
Yachtsman
says...
3:52pm Fri 4 Jan 13
marshman wrote:Saville = High Street "Over Trading" commissioned by SUFC therefore interested party to new stadium
So the council get consultants in to compile a report that says the High Street is 'over-trading'. Then they get consultants in to compile a report that says there's no evidence of that 'on the ground'. I think they should get consultants in to compile a report that tells them consultant's report aren't worth the paper they're written on.
Hearn = High Street "Nott Overtrading" commisioned by SBC.
Savilles stated at 1st Application that Sutton Road is a local rural lane that would not be affected by the increase in traffic - well I know which report I will beleive and it would not be Savilles
Letmetryagain
says...
4:50pm Fri 4 Jan 13
Making money for themselves.
mys842
says...
4:55pm Fri 4 Jan 13
sjreynolds143 wrote:B and Q is usually packed at the weekends. On a bank holiday it's a no go zone.
mys842 wrote: I disagree. The type of shops attracted to retail parks are entirely different to those on the high street. Look around at other parks, the airport one, the numerous Thurrock ones and even the existing shops around Fossets way. They are never empty, people are always in those shops yet they're not detracting from High Street trade. I for one would be very happy to bring more shops towards the Thorpe Bay/Shoebury/Southch urch/Wakering area.Ah yes. Airport Trading Estate - PC World, closed. Fossets - Comet, closed. The airport estate is only busy because it has Macdonalds. And when did you ever see the B&Q car park full? Maplin isn't exactly heaving, either. SBC should stick to their guns. The extra cash could rejuvenate the High Street, if only by making car parking free for a few years!
Absolute rubbish about there being a McDonalds there. People go there as I do because either, they need an alternative to the town centre Argos, the need Staples or one of the discount shops. It has free parking unlike town centres and is therefore highly attractive. PC world has been almagated to the London Road retail park - not a town centre location. In fact the town centre one closed.
Comet closed as did almost every other comet store in the country - this is nothing to do with Southend.
The extra caseh won't be spent on Southend High Street and we all know it. It's like SBC council have given up on the High Street. If they hadn't they'd knock down some of the eyesore buildings, reduce parking charges for non-seafront car parks, attract businesses to The Victoria, etc etc etc
Max Impact
says...
6:47pm Fri 4 Jan 13
mys842 wrote:You beat me to it about PCWorld/Currys becoming one
sjreynolds143 wrote:B and Q is usually packed at the weekends. On a bank holiday it's a no go zone.
mys842 wrote: I disagree. The type of shops attracted to retail parks are entirely different to those on the high street. Look around at other parks, the airport one, the numerous Thurrock ones and even the existing shops around Fossets way. They are never empty, people are always in those shops yet they're not detracting from High Street trade. I for one would be very happy to bring more shops towards the Thorpe Bay/Shoebury/Southch urch/Wakering area.Ah yes. Airport Trading Estate - PC World, closed. Fossets - Comet, closed. The airport estate is only busy because it has Macdonalds. And when did you ever see the B&Q car park full? Maplin isn't exactly heaving, either. SBC should stick to their guns. The extra cash could rejuvenate the High Street, if only by making car parking free for a few years!
Absolute rubbish about there being a McDonalds there. People go there as I do because either, they need an alternative to the town centre Argos, the need Staples or one of the discount shops. It has free parking unlike town centres and is therefore highly attractive. PC world has been almagated to the London Road retail park - not a town centre location. In fact the town centre one closed.
Comet closed as did almost every other comet store in the country - this is nothing to do with Southend.
The extra caseh won't be spent on Southend High Street and we all know it. It's like SBC council have given up on the High Street. If they hadn't they'd knock down some of the eyesore buildings, reduce parking charges for non-seafront car parks, attract businesses to The Victoria, etc etc etc
and Comet going bust nationwide.
Some fools on here blamed Southend for the demise (on the High Street) of
TJ Hughes, Woolworths & Hawkins Bazaar
I kid you not!
asbo. just the truth
says...
7:12pm Fri 4 Jan 13
gary 51
says...
9:55am Sat 5 Jan 13
jolllyboy
says...
5:15pm Sat 5 Jan 13
Max Impact
says...
7:16pm Sat 5 Jan 13
jolllyboy wrote:Thinking about it... Still thinking about it... Erm...Er... Well apart form a successful retail park and a successful airport can't think of anything else.
This council will do anything to get money to pay their bonus'. If enough 'incentive' payments are given I feel the council will change their minds ! It is legalised bribery. Anyone who thinks a Retail Park so far to the end of the town as Fossetts Farm is a good idea (and I am sure all those in shoebury would like it) are living in cloud cuckoo land. it would be easier to go in the other direction out of town. As for the Airport Retail park is is always very busy but I expect there is a hidden agenda there as well.......think about it.
Do tell what is this secret agenda you allude to, please tell do please tell pretty please with sugar and a cherry on top.
RobertFS
says...
6:35pm Sun 6 Jan 13
Sorry SBC - lost income
But revitalise the High street.
make your choice.
i for one will not go to Southend High street from Leigh when i can go to Bluewater for the day or even Lakeside and the retail park and park for free. Better choice and no stupid charges.
Another reason why i won't go to the Stratford site (westfield?) - parking charges.
Max Impact
says...
2:13pm Mon 7 Jan 13
Max Impact wrote:Still thinking...
jolllyboy wrote:Thinking about it... Still thinking about it... Erm...Er... Well apart form a successful retail park and a successful airport can't think of anything else.
This council will do anything to get money to pay their bonus'. If enough 'incentive' payments are given I feel the council will change their minds ! It is legalised bribery. Anyone who thinks a Retail Park so far to the end of the town as Fossetts Farm is a good idea (and I am sure all those in shoebury would like it) are living in cloud cuckoo land. it would be easier to go in the other direction out of town. As for the Airport Retail park is is always very busy but I expect there is a hidden agenda there as well.......think about it.
Do tell what is this secret agenda you allude to, please tell do please tell pretty please with sugar and a cherry on top.
Max Impact
says...
3:18pm Tue 8 Jan 13
Max Impact wrote:Still thinking... Oh look free airport parking for two months... still thinking...
Max Impact wrote:Still thinking...
jolllyboy wrote:Thinking about it... Still thinking about it... Erm...Er... Well apart form a successful retail park and a successful airport can't think of anything else.
This council will do anything to get money to pay their bonus'. If enough 'incentive' payments are given I feel the council will change their minds ! It is legalised bribery. Anyone who thinks a Retail Park so far to the end of the town as Fossetts Farm is a good idea (and I am sure all those in shoebury would like it) are living in cloud cuckoo land. it would be easier to go in the other direction out of town. As for the Airport Retail park is is always very busy but I expect there is a hidden agenda there as well.......think about it.
Do tell what is this secret agenda you allude to, please tell do please tell pretty please with sugar and a cherry on top.
Anyone...
Max Impact
says...
6:47pm Thu 10 Jan 13
Max Impact wrote:Still thinking... Hello... Anyone... Hello...
Max Impact wrote:Still thinking... Oh look free airport parking for two months... still thinking...
Max Impact wrote:Still thinking...
jolllyboy wrote:Thinking about it... Still thinking about it... Erm...Er... Well apart form a successful retail park and a successful airport can't think of anything else.
This council will do anything to get money to pay their bonus'. If enough 'incentive' payments are given I feel the council will change their minds ! It is legalised bribery. Anyone who thinks a Retail Park so far to the end of the town as Fossetts Farm is a good idea (and I am sure all those in shoebury would like it) are living in cloud cuckoo land. it would be easier to go in the other direction out of town. As for the Airport Retail park is is always very busy but I expect there is a hidden agenda there as well.......think about it.
Do tell what is this secret agenda you allude to, please tell do please tell pretty please with sugar and a cherry on top.
Anyone...
SARFENDMAN says...
6:22am Fri 4 Jan 13