MPs outline road wish-list for Essex (From Southend Standard)
Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting ECHONEWS to 80360, or email us Click here for details »
MPs outline road wish-list for Essex
8:20am Thursday 25th October 2012 in Echo News
MPs outline road wish-list for Essex
A FREE Dartford crossing and a Shoebury bypass are among the items on the transport wish-list for south Essex’s MPs.
During a debate on the county’s infrastructure in the House of Commons yesterday, Tory MPs James Duddridge and Jackie Doyle-Price called for measures to improve the lives of everyday motorists.
Ms Doyle-Price, who represents Thurrock, said the case still needed “to be made” for retaining toll charges at the Dartford crossing and claimed removing them would speed up M25 traffic considerably.
Following her cue, Rochford and Southend East MP James Duddridge called for a relief road to end the uncertainty of trips between the outskirts of Southend and Shoebury.
He said: “Broadly speaking, we would like an outer relief road, from Shoebury, bypassing Southend.
“However, in all candour, all alternatives at the moment would involve housing all along the side of the road, which would put congestion back into the system.”
Comments(16)
PJR-121
says...
8:56am Thu 25 Oct 12
Nebs
says...
8:59am Thu 25 Oct 12
Eric Whim
says...
9:03am Thu 25 Oct 12
Shoebury_Cyclist
says...
9:04am Thu 25 Oct 12
PJR-121
says...
9:58am Thu 25 Oct 12
Shoebury_Cyclist wrote:Well, people don't want to give up their cars, so what would your solution be?
Building more roads to cure congestion is like selling bigger trousers to beat obesity.
And charging people to get out of their cars won't work either - petrol prices rising sharply hasn't reduced the number of vehicles on the UK roads by a significant amount...
Shoebury_Cyclist
says...
10:13am Thu 25 Oct 12
"The online poll of 2,669 adult motorists found that four in 10 are cutting back on time spent on the road and looking to public transport (20%), walking (32%) or cycling (5%)."
http://www.guardian.
co.uk/money/2012/jul
/25/majority-car-own
ers-struggling-costs
I'd say that 40% of motorists reducing their car use is quite a significant number.
Barry Bas
says...
10:50am Thu 25 Oct 12
Shoebury_Cyclist wrote:That's 40% of 2669, not that big a sample size to start with when you consider that there is about 30 million cars on the road. I'm not a statician but I don't think that you could, or at least should, claim that relates to all car drivers in the country.
Many motorists are reducing their car use: "The online poll of 2,669 adult motorists found that four in 10 are cutting back on time spent on the road and looking to public transport (20%), walking (32%) or cycling (5%)." http://www.guardian. co.uk/money/2012/jul /25/majority-car-own ers-struggling-costs I'd say that 40% of motorists reducing their car use is quite a significant number.
Shoebury_Cyclist
says...
11:00am Thu 25 Oct 12
Barry Bas wrote:That's how all opinion polls work. A random selection of people are questioned. Sometimes we agree with the figures and sometimes we don't.
Shoebury_Cyclist wrote:That's 40% of 2669, not that big a sample size to start with when you consider that there is about 30 million cars on the road. I'm not a statician but I don't think that you could, or at least should, claim that relates to all car drivers in the country.
Many motorists are reducing their car use: "The online poll of 2,669 adult motorists found that four in 10 are cutting back on time spent on the road and looking to public transport (20%), walking (32%) or cycling (5%)." http://www.guardian. co.uk/money/2012/jul /25/majority-car-own ers-struggling-costs I'd say that 40% of motorists reducing their car use is quite a significant number.
PJR-121
says...
12:00pm Thu 25 Oct 12
40% of 0.008% of the total amount of vehicle on the road - Sorry but I don't like opinion polls at the best of times, but that's a very low percentage to take seriously.
So how would you address the problem? I'll agree you can't build new roads everywhere though, otherwise the country would be nothing but concrete...
Shoebury_Cyclist
says...
12:40pm Thu 25 Oct 12
PJR-121 wrote:You don't understand how polls and percentages work, do you?
The poll also says reducing - not giving up, so at some point these vehicles will still be on the road. Define reducing - does it mean they don't use the car at weekends? or travel to work by public transport one day out of five?
40% of 0.008% of the total amount of vehicle on the road - Sorry but I don't like opinion polls at the best of times, but that's a very low percentage to take seriously.
So how would you address the problem? I'll agree you can't build new roads everywhere though, otherwise the country would be nothing but concrete...
Eric Whim
says...
12:50pm Thu 25 Oct 12
PJR-121
says...
3:19pm Thu 25 Oct 12
Shoebury_Cyclist wrote:Oh I do, but I'd prefer a larger group were asked to garner a more representative figure.
PJR-121 wrote: The poll also says reducing - not giving up, so at some point these vehicles will still be on the road. Define reducing - does it mean they don't use the car at weekends? or travel to work by public transport one day out of five? 40% of 0.008% of the total amount of vehicle on the road - Sorry but I don't like opinion polls at the best of times, but that's a very low percentage to take seriously. So how would you address the problem? I'll agree you can't build new roads everywhere though, otherwise the country would be nothing but concrete...You don't understand how polls and percentages work, do you?
And again, reducing vehicle use and giving it up completely are two seperate things.
The problem as I see it is that a car can go anywhere, while a bus or train will only stop at certain points, and the cost is large if you want to travel distance.
A bike is fine for short to medium journeys, but for long journeys it becomes a bit of an issue. Combining the two - a train then bike, would be nice, but most train companies ban bikes on rush hour services.
However, in terms of the motorways, the Managed Motorway system, adding another lane of traffic in busy periods, does seem to work. It means no new roads are needed, and no significant widening too.
Bypasses of major population points too are a good idea, however it needs to be proven that the roads being bypassed do pose a problem.
Shoebury_Cyclist
says...
4:47pm Thu 25 Oct 12
Nebs
says...
6:22pm Thu 25 Oct 12
Shoebury_Cyclist wrote:40% is very significant. If everyone reduced their driving by 40% all the problems would be solved. But the survey does not tell us how much they are reducing their driving. The other 60%, if they are not reducing, must by definition either be doing the same or increasing. No conclusions can be drawn from this survey as it does not provide enough information.
Many motorists are reducing their car use:
"The online poll of 2,669 adult motorists found that four in 10 are cutting back on time spent on the road and looking to public transport (20%), walking (32%) or cycling (5%)."
http://www.guardian.
co.uk/money/2012/jul
/25/majority-car-own
ers-struggling-costs
I'd say that 40% of motorists reducing their car use is quite a significant number.
Horton
says...
6:36pm Thu 25 Oct 12
EssexBoy1956 says...
7:26am Thu 25 Oct 12