Drugs raid in Shoebury (From Southend Standard)

DEBT*COLLECTOR wrote:
Waste of police time and resources. You can have 10 plants growing and its just a warning notice or caution. Its personal use up to 10 plants. If people want to smoke plant leaves then whos business is it, definatley not mine. If someone sits in there own house drinking wine or beer then whos it affecting ? But if someone is selling crack on a street corner then give em a life sentence. Ive tried smoking plant leaves and It gives me a headache, but I enjoy a fag and a scotch in my own house.

Basildon.lad.21 wrote:

DEBT*COLLECTOR wrote: Waste of police time and resources. You can have 10 plants growing and its just a warning notice or caution. Its personal use up to 10 plants. If people want to smoke plant leaves then whos business is it, definatley not mine. If someone sits in there own house drinking wine or beer then whos it affecting ? But if someone is selling crack on a street corner then give em a life sentence. Ive tried smoking plant leaves and It gives me a headache, but I enjoy a fag and a scotch in my own house.

Im not condoning it, but to be honest, even if people are selling crack on the street, who are they harming?

LJK wrote:

Basildon.lad.21 wrote:

DEBT*COLLECTOR wrote: Waste of police time and resources. You can have 10 plants growing and its just a warning notice or caution. Its personal use up to 10 plants. If people want to smoke plant leaves then whos business is it, definatley not mine. If someone sits in there own house drinking wine or beer then whos it affecting ? But if someone is selling crack on a street corner then give em a life sentence. Ive tried smoking plant leaves and It gives me a headache, but I enjoy a fag and a scotch in my own house.

Im not condoning it, but to be honest, even if people are selling crack on the street, who are they harming?

Oh I don't know, maybe the victims of crime fuelled by drug abuse whether that be sex trafficking, gang-related crime, burglaries and robberies at gun/knifepoint, stabbings, shootings and murders? Idiot.

LJK wrote:

Basildon.lad.21 wrote:

DEBT*COLLECTOR wrote: Waste of police time and resources. You can have 10 plants growing and its just a warning notice or caution. Its personal use up to 10 plants. If people want to smoke plant leaves then whos business is it, definatley not mine. If someone sits in there own house drinking wine or beer then whos it affecting ? But if someone is selling crack on a street corner then give em a life sentence. Ive tried smoking plant leaves and It gives me a headache, but I enjoy a fag and a scotch in my own house.

Im not condoning it, but to be honest, even if people are selling crack on the street, who are they harming?

Oh I don't know, maybe the victims of crime fuelled by drug abuse whether that be sex trafficking, gang-related crime, burglaries and robberies at gun/knifepoint, stabbings, shootings and murders? Idiot.

LJK wrote:

Basildon.lad.21 wrote:

DEBT*COLLECTOR wrote: Waste of police time and resources. You can have 10 plants growing and its just a warning notice or caution. Its personal use up to 10 plants. If people want to smoke plant leaves then whos business is it, definatley not mine. If someone sits in there own house drinking wine or beer then whos it affecting ? But if someone is selling crack on a street corner then give em a life sentence. Ive tried smoking plant leaves and It gives me a headache, but I enjoy a fag and a scotch in my own house.

Im not condoning it, but to be honest, even if people are selling crack on the street, who are they harming?

Oh I don't know, maybe the victims of crime fuelled by drug abuse whether that be sex trafficking, gang-related crime, burglaries and robberies at gun/knifepoint, stabbings, shootings and murders? Idiot.

Truth Will Prevail wrote:
He was talking about crack cocaine you muppet, not relevant at all for cannabis. So all the damage done by alcohol is fine because it's legal is it? No wonder this country is going down the tubes.

Nebs wrote:
Well done the police. Keep up the good work. Maybe there should be spot fines for possession of this illegal drug.

jayman wrote:
well done essex police. another 'proceeds of crime' 'easy pay day' that will help recoup 100% of police costs and also a victim surcharge 'more money for the community drug rehab system' awesome work.

Chazmondo wrote:
Drugs raid in Shoebury............

.Do the Southend Echo just copy paste this every other day.......What do you expect..........It's Shoebury lol

Truth Will Prevail wrote:
Pembury, I don't actually disagree with most of that except you are not making any distinction between the different drugs, for example the drugs that kill the most people and damage the most lives are alcohol and nicotine which are both legal whereas the only drug that has never killed anyone from an overdose is cannabis which is currently illegal. If our laws were based on truth and the scientific evidence rather than prejudice and ignorance that would be the other way round, alcohol and nicotine would be illegal and cannabis would be the only legal drug.

shoebury52 wrote:

Truth Will Prevail wrote: Pembury, I don't actually disagree with most of that except you are not making any distinction between the different drugs, for example the drugs that kill the most people and damage the most lives are alcohol and nicotine which are both legal whereas the only drug that has never killed anyone from an overdose is cannabis which is currently illegal. If our laws were based on truth and the scientific evidence rather than prejudice and ignorance that would be the other way round, alcohol and nicotine would be illegal and cannabis would be the only legal drug.

So no one who is taking cannabis has ever driven a car and killed someone or attacked anyone, or tried to do something thinking they was invincible cos they was high. It's not all about overdose.

perini wrote:
Better off dealing with the Somalian drug dealers - try Malvern, Quantock and Chiltern - than worrying about a few plants in someones garden shed!

shoebury52 wrote:

Truth Will Prevail wrote:
Pembury, I don't actually disagree with most of that except you are not making any distinction between the different drugs, for example the drugs that kill the most people and damage the most lives are alcohol and nicotine which are both legal whereas the only drug that has never killed anyone from an overdose is cannabis which is currently illegal. If our laws were based on truth and the scientific evidence rather than prejudice and ignorance that would be the other way round, alcohol and nicotine would be illegal and cannabis would be the only legal drug.

So no one who is taking cannabis has ever driven a car and killed someone or attacked anyone, or tried to do something thinking they was invincible cos they was high. It's not all about overdose.

InTheKnowOk wrote:
Laughing out LOUD at the dude with the numerous accounts bigging up weed ..

beyond the valley of the asbos wrote:

InTheKnowOk wrote:
Laughing out LOUD at the dude with the numerous accounts bigging up weed ..

yes the mongwithabong has had his supply lines disrupted by all accounts

monginathong wrote:

beyond the valley of the asbos wrote:

InTheKnowOk wrote: Laughing out LOUD at the dude with the numerous accounts bigging up weed ..

yes the mongwithabong has had his supply lines disrupted by all accounts

hello hello hello a couple of biters! if your insinuating iv posted under multiple accounts your wrong,i just happen to know the recipient of the police visit and i signed up today and have one account, as for disrupted?I happen to know thats just plain wrong,when i said incompetent i ment it, amongst other things they took no dog ,which by all accounts would of been cheaper and probably more intelligent than half of those that did turn up!

monginathong wrote:

beyond the valley of the asbos wrote:

InTheKnowOk wrote:
Laughing out LOUD at the dude with the numerous accounts bigging up weed ..

yes the mongwithabong has had his supply lines disrupted by all accounts

hello hello hello a couple of biters! if your insinuating iv posted under multiple accounts your wrong,i just happen to know the recipient of the police visit and i signed up today and have one account,
as for disrupted?I happen to know thats just plain wrong,when i said incompetent i ment it, amongst other things they took no dog ,which by all accounts would of been cheaper and probably more intelligent than half of those that did turn up!

beyond the valley of the asbos wrote:
i applaud the police's action. anything that disrupts supply and makes the junkies' lives that bit tougher is excellent in my book. all we need now is a few more prisons to house the perpetrators.

Truth Will Prevail wrote:

beyond the valley of the asbos wrote:
i applaud the police's action. anything that disrupts supply and makes the junkies' lives that bit tougher is excellent in my book. all we need now is a few more prisons to house the perpetrators.

Congratulations! You get the prize for the most ignorant comments on this story. Care in the community has a lot to answer for

Alec Cikes wrote:
Does it really matter. Leave these people be.

Truth Will Prevail wrote:
More ignorant arguments from Asbo, the real truth is that weed is EVERYWHERE! Best national estimates say 7 million smoke, thats more than one in ten of the UK population but a recent London survey suggests an even higher proportion smoke in London, even one on ten of the over 65s, and yes of course some of the underclass smoke as it's a lot cheaper than alcohol. On the other hand I have even worked in posh London offices where a bag of weed was always available in the fridge to inspire the workers (yes, in some jobs it can). Little do you know Asbo. So, if there are so many smokers where are all the cannabis casulaties clogging up our hospitals? The correct answer is there are hardly any compared to alcohol casualties.
.
Still waiting for your apologies ET!

Truth Will Prevail wrote:
Brainless as ever Asbo. So if you're the expert (very definitely not) then do tell us exactly what are these cannabis casualties that don't end up in Hospital? Would they be the same sort of problems that a LOT more people suffer from alcohol abuse?

Truth Will Prevail wrote:
Cheat! You are a devious distorting troll Asbo. You know full well that I qualified that comment by telling you I only knew of ONE person who spent that on weed, others spend much less. You know full well that is true don't you? No point trying to talk sensibly to someone with such a cavalier attitude to the truth.
.
It's also very sad that you can even lay your hands on that comment, don't you have anything else to do? Thought not.
.
I'm still waiting to hear your idea to reduce the number of kids smoking. Beheading? Hanging tokers from lamposts? Thats what I expect from a lame brain like you who is completely divorced from reality.

Alekhine wrote:
Good.

Yes, I did notice that. It could have got very crowded and confusing for the pair of you with both of you posting on the same thread at the same time. You might have met yourself coming back.

Yes, the thread has been deleted. Certainly nothing to do with me, you?

So you are saying that you were never on the string about litter wardens being abolished in Basildon?. So it was'nt you who reacted to the poster j-w when he missed the "s" of the word spike, that was a faker? It was'nt you who reacted when doeasilikey said Stanley was back, that was another faker?

Oh Dear, Oh dear.

As a quick memory refresher (yes, some people have got them)- it was me who challenged your ID. I responded to the poster Soothchurch59, who had said something about Buddha, with a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth, (what you believe is real). Then suddenly I was taking to you! Naturally I asked if you had forgotten to change your login.

During your response, you said that you had "not noticed the poster Soothchurch59 before"

On checking, i found that he had been in close support to you over the last three threads that you had been on. Even more astonishing was that 40 minutes before your "i never noticed him" post, you had double quoted each other with a message about double accounts and split personalities needing mental health care!!!

Now do you understand?

Should i take a print before this string is deleted?

==
You have been talking about moon fakery all over this site, if you don't understand the Dylan reference i can't help you?

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote:
Good.

Yes, I did notice that. It could have got very crowded and confusing for the pair of you with both of you posting on the same thread at the same time. You might have met yourself coming back.

Yes, the thread has been deleted. Certainly nothing to do with me, you?

So you are saying that you were never on the string about litter wardens being abolished in Basildon?. So it was'nt you who reacted to the poster j-w when he missed the "s" of the word spike, that was a faker? It was'nt you who reacted when doeasilikey said Stanley was back, that was another faker?

Oh Dear, Oh dear.

As a quick memory refresher (yes, some people have got them)- it was me who challenged your ID. I responded to the poster Soothchurch59, who had said something about Buddha, with a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth, (what you believe is real). Then suddenly I was taking to you! Naturally I asked if you had forgotten to change your login.

During your response, you said that you had "not noticed the poster Soothchurch59 before"

On checking, i found that he had been in close support to you over the last three threads that you had been on. Even more astonishing was that 40 minutes before your "i never noticed him" post, you had double quoted each other with a message about double accounts and split personalities needing mental health care!!!

Now do you understand?

Should i take a print before this string is deleted?

==
You have been talking about moon fakery all over this site, if you don't understand the Dylan reference i can't help you?

I have jettisoned E-types, it is getting too problematic to keep it, not only for me but for others who have been confused by the name and the person who likes to copy it.

Now i know what thread you mean and who you mean. I thought you were talking about that young poster who came on the thread and was posting good sense and who suggested most of the posters on the tread were trolls!

The poster you mention did indeed post what you say he did, and i felt that was purposely done to invite the comments that invariably followed. If he had said that wasn't the case then i would of accepted that but he didn't, or as far as i know as i left the thread long before it was locked.

I was not concentrating on Soothchurch and didn't even know there was two until you pointed it out.

I dont think he was supporting me i think he was just being neutral in not attacking me for the sake of culture.

I attended a do in London where there was all different cultures and the thing that struck me was how all just accepted that we were all the same under the cultural skin. I really do believe that those who cant accept this are less evolved mentally than those who do.

I assure you i am not Soouthchurch nor Southchurch and i would say i am against anyone having more than one user name at a time and using that to support their own posts...i find that utterly weird!

I have only been responding to the poster who believes man walked on the moon...he offers no proof other than they did...it means nothing to me one way or the other as i know what i believe and i wont be buying any moon rock.

No I dont get the Dylan ref not being much of a fan but here is a bit from REM

"If you believed they put a man on the moon, man on the moon
If you believe there's nothing up his sleeve, then nothing is cool"

Truth is you either believe or your dont or you dont care. Two of those options apply to me.

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote:
Good.

Yes, I did notice that. It could have got very crowded and confusing for the pair of you with both of you posting on the same thread at the same time. You might have met yourself coming back.

Yes, the thread has been deleted. Certainly nothing to do with me, you?

So you are saying that you were never on the string about litter wardens being abolished in Basildon?. So it was'nt you who reacted to the poster j-w when he missed the "s" of the word spike, that was a faker? It was'nt you who reacted when doeasilikey said Stanley was back, that was another faker?

Oh Dear, Oh dear.

As a quick memory refresher (yes, some people have got them)- it was me who challenged your ID. I responded to the poster Soothchurch59, who had said something about Buddha, with a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth, (what you believe is real). Then suddenly I was taking to you! Naturally I asked if you had forgotten to change your login.

During your response, you said that you had "not noticed the poster Soothchurch59 before"

On checking, i found that he had been in close support to you over the last three threads that you had been on. Even more astonishing was that 40 minutes before your "i never noticed him" post, you had double quoted each other with a message about double accounts and split personalities needing mental health care!!!

Now do you understand?

Should i take a print before this string is deleted?

==
You have been talking about moon fakery all over this site, if you don't understand the Dylan reference i can't help you?

I have jettisoned E-types, it is getting too problematic to keep it, not only for me but for others who have been confused by the name and the person who likes to copy it.

Now i know what thread you mean and who you mean. I thought you were talking about that young poster who came on the thread and was posting good sense and who suggested most of the posters on the tread were trolls!

The poster you mention did indeed post what you say he did, and i felt that was purposely done to invite the comments that invariably followed. If he had said that wasn't the case then i would of accepted that but he didn't, or as far as i know as i left the thread long before it was locked.

I was not concentrating on Soothchurch and didn't even know there was two until you pointed it out.

I dont think he was supporting me i think he was just being neutral in not attacking me for the sake of culture.

I attended a do in London where there was all different cultures and the thing that struck me was how all just accepted that we were all the same under the cultural skin. I really do believe that those who cant accept this are less evolved mentally than those who do.

I assure you i am not Soouthchurch nor Southchurch and i would say i am against anyone having more than one user name at a time and using that to support their own posts...i find that utterly weird!

I have only been responding to the poster who believes man walked on the moon...he offers no proof other than they did...it means nothing to me one way or the other as i know what i believe and i wont be buying any moon rock.

No I dont get the Dylan ref not being much of a fan but here is a bit from REM

"If you believed they put a man on the moon, man on the moon
If you believe there's nothing up his sleeve, then nothing is cool"

Truth is you either believe or your dont or you dont care. Two of those options apply to me.

Just for the record: I have only ever been me.

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote:
Good.

Yes, I did notice that. It could have got very crowded and confusing for the pair of you with both of you posting on the same thread at the same time. You might have met yourself coming back.

Yes, the thread has been deleted. Certainly nothing to do with me, you?

So you are saying that you were never on the string about litter wardens being abolished in Basildon?. So it was'nt you who reacted to the poster j-w when he missed the "s" of the word spike, that was a faker? It was'nt you who reacted when doeasilikey said Stanley was back, that was another faker?

Oh Dear, Oh dear.

As a quick memory refresher (yes, some people have got them)- it was me who challenged your ID. I responded to the poster Soothchurch59, who had said something about Buddha, with a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth, (what you believe is real). Then suddenly I was taking to you! Naturally I asked if you had forgotten to change your login.

During your response, you said that you had "not noticed the poster Soothchurch59 before"

On checking, i found that he had been in close support to you over the last three threads that you had been on. Even more astonishing was that 40 minutes before your "i never noticed him" post, you had double quoted each other with a message about double accounts and split personalities needing mental health care!!!

Now do you understand?

Should i take a print before this string is deleted?

==
You have been talking about moon fakery all over this site, if you don't understand the Dylan reference i can't help you?

I have jettisoned E-types, it is getting too problematic to keep it, not only for me but for others who have been confused by the name and the person who likes to copy it.

Now i know what thread you mean and who you mean. I thought you were talking about that young poster who came on the thread and was posting good sense and who suggested most of the posters on the tread were trolls!

The poster you mention did indeed post what you say he did, and i felt that was purposely done to invite the comments that invariably followed. If he had said that wasn't the case then i would of accepted that but he didn't, or as far as i know as i left the thread long before it was locked.

I was not concentrating on Soothchurch and didn't even know there was two until you pointed it out.

I dont think he was supporting me i think he was just being neutral in not attacking me for the sake of culture.

I attended a do in London where there was all different cultures and the thing that struck me was how all just accepted that we were all the same under the cultural skin. I really do believe that those who cant accept this are less evolved mentally than those who do.

I assure you i am not Soouthchurch nor Southchurch and i would say i am against anyone having more than one user name at a time and using that to support their own posts...i find that utterly weird!

I have only been responding to the poster who believes man walked on the moon...he offers no proof other than they did...it means nothing to me one way or the other as i know what i believe and i wont be buying any moon rock.

No I dont get the Dylan ref not being much of a fan but here is a bit from REM

"If you believed they put a man on the moon, man on the moon
If you believe there's nothing up his sleeve, then nothing is cool"

Truth is you either believe or your dont or you dont care. Two of those options apply to me.

Just for the record: I have only ever been me.

Im me! You must be you!

beyond the valley of the asbos wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote:
Good.

Yes, I did notice that. It could have got very crowded and confusing for the pair of you with both of you posting on the same thread at the same time. You might have met yourself coming back.

Yes, the thread has been deleted. Certainly nothing to do with me, you?

So you are saying that you were never on the string about litter wardens being abolished in Basildon?. So it was'nt you who reacted to the poster j-w when he missed the "s" of the word spike, that was a faker? It was'nt you who reacted when doeasilikey said Stanley was back, that was another faker?

Oh Dear, Oh dear.

As a quick memory refresher (yes, some people have got them)- it was me who challenged your ID. I responded to the poster Soothchurch59, who had said something about Buddha, with a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth, (what you believe is real). Then suddenly I was taking to you! Naturally I asked if you had forgotten to change your login.

During your response, you said that you had "not noticed the poster Soothchurch59 before"

On checking, i found that he had been in close support to you over the last three threads that you had been on. Even more astonishing was that 40 minutes before your "i never noticed him" post, you had double quoted each other with a message about double accounts and split personalities needing mental health care!!!

Now do you understand?

Should i take a print before this string is deleted?

==
You have been talking about moon fakery all over this site, if you don't understand the Dylan reference i can't help you?

I have jettisoned E-types, it is getting too problematic to keep it, not only for me but for others who have been confused by the name and the person who likes to copy it.

Now i know what thread you mean and who you mean. I thought you were talking about that young poster who came on the thread and was posting good sense and who suggested most of the posters on the tread were trolls!

The poster you mention did indeed post what you say he did, and i felt that was purposely done to invite the comments that invariably followed. If he had said that wasn't the case then i would of accepted that but he didn't, or as far as i know as i left the thread long before it was locked.

I was not concentrating on Soothchurch and didn't even know there was two until you pointed it out.

I dont think he was supporting me i think he was just being neutral in not attacking me for the sake of culture.

I attended a do in London where there was all different cultures and the thing that struck me was how all just accepted that we were all the same under the cultural skin. I really do believe that those who cant accept this are less evolved mentally than those who do.

I assure you i am not Soouthchurch nor Southchurch and i would say i am against anyone having more than one user name at a time and using that to support their own posts...i find that utterly weird!

I have only been responding to the poster who believes man walked on the moon...he offers no proof other than they did...it means nothing to me one way or the other as i know what i believe and i wont be buying any moon rock.

No I dont get the Dylan ref not being much of a fan but here is a bit from REM

"If you believed they put a man on the moon, man on the moon
If you believe there's nothing up his sleeve, then nothing is cool"

Truth is you either believe or your dont or you dont care. Two of those options apply to me.

Just for the record: I have only ever been me.

Im me! You must be you!

so to the uninitiated not participating in the love-in - can you explain what's the rumpus?

beyond the valley of the asbos wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote:
Good.

Yes, I did notice that. It could have got very crowded and confusing for the pair of you with both of you posting on the same thread at the same time. You might have met yourself coming back.

Yes, the thread has been deleted. Certainly nothing to do with me, you?

So you are saying that you were never on the string about litter wardens being abolished in Basildon?. So it was'nt you who reacted to the poster j-w when he missed the "s" of the word spike, that was a faker? It was'nt you who reacted when doeasilikey said Stanley was back, that was another faker?

Oh Dear, Oh dear.

As a quick memory refresher (yes, some people have got them)- it was me who challenged your ID. I responded to the poster Soothchurch59, who had said something about Buddha, with a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth, (what you believe is real). Then suddenly I was taking to you! Naturally I asked if you had forgotten to change your login.

During your response, you said that you had "not noticed the poster Soothchurch59 before"

On checking, i found that he had been in close support to you over the last three threads that you had been on. Even more astonishing was that 40 minutes before your "i never noticed him" post, you had double quoted each other with a message about double accounts and split personalities needing mental health care!!!

Now do you understand?

Should i take a print before this string is deleted?

==
You have been talking about moon fakery all over this site, if you don't understand the Dylan reference i can't help you?

I have jettisoned E-types, it is getting too problematic to keep it, not only for me but for others who have been confused by the name and the person who likes to copy it.

Now i know what thread you mean and who you mean. I thought you were talking about that young poster who came on the thread and was posting good sense and who suggested most of the posters on the tread were trolls!

The poster you mention did indeed post what you say he did, and i felt that was purposely done to invite the comments that invariably followed. If he had said that wasn't the case then i would of accepted that but he didn't, or as far as i know as i left the thread long before it was locked.

I was not concentrating on Soothchurch and didn't even know there was two until you pointed it out.

I dont think he was supporting me i think he was just being neutral in not attacking me for the sake of culture.

I attended a do in London where there was all different cultures and the thing that struck me was how all just accepted that we were all the same under the cultural skin. I really do believe that those who cant accept this are less evolved mentally than those who do.

I assure you i am not Soouthchurch nor Southchurch and i would say i am against anyone having more than one user name at a time and using that to support their own posts...i find that utterly weird!

I have only been responding to the poster who believes man walked on the moon...he offers no proof other than they did...it means nothing to me one way or the other as i know what i believe and i wont be buying any moon rock.

No I dont get the Dylan ref not being much of a fan but here is a bit from REM

"If you believed they put a man on the moon, man on the moon
If you believe there's nothing up his sleeve, then nothing is cool"

Truth is you either believe or your dont or you dont care. Two of those options apply to me.

Just for the record: I have only ever been me.

Im me! You must be you!

so to the uninitiated not participating in the love-in - can you explain what's the rumpus?

Alekhine wrote:

beyond the valley of the asbos wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote:
Good.

Yes, I did notice that. It could have got very crowded and confusing for the pair of you with both of you posting on the same thread at the same time. You might have met yourself coming back.

Yes, the thread has been deleted. Certainly nothing to do with me, you?

So you are saying that you were never on the string about litter wardens being abolished in Basildon?. So it was'nt you who reacted to the poster j-w when he missed the "s" of the word spike, that was a faker? It was'nt you who reacted when doeasilikey said Stanley was back, that was another faker?

Oh Dear, Oh dear.

As a quick memory refresher (yes, some people have got them)- it was me who challenged your ID. I responded to the poster Soothchurch59, who had said something about Buddha, with a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth, (what you believe is real). Then suddenly I was taking to you! Naturally I asked if you had forgotten to change your login.

During your response, you said that you had "not noticed the poster Soothchurch59 before"

On checking, i found that he had been in close support to you over the last three threads that you had been on. Even more astonishing was that 40 minutes before your "i never noticed him" post, you had double quoted each other with a message about double accounts and split personalities needing mental health care!!!

Now do you understand?

Should i take a print before this string is deleted?

==
You have been talking about moon fakery all over this site, if you don't understand the Dylan reference i can't help you?

I have jettisoned E-types, it is getting too problematic to keep it, not only for me but for others who have been confused by the name and the person who likes to copy it.

Now i know what thread you mean and who you mean. I thought you were talking about that young poster who came on the thread and was posting good sense and who suggested most of the posters on the tread were trolls!

The poster you mention did indeed post what you say he did, and i felt that was purposely done to invite the comments that invariably followed. If he had said that wasn't the case then i would of accepted that but he didn't, or as far as i know as i left the thread long before it was locked.

I was not concentrating on Soothchurch and didn't even know there was two until you pointed it out.

I dont think he was supporting me i think he was just being neutral in not attacking me for the sake of culture.

I attended a do in London where there was all different cultures and the thing that struck me was how all just accepted that we were all the same under the cultural skin. I really do believe that those who cant accept this are less evolved mentally than those who do.

I assure you i am not Soouthchurch nor Southchurch and i would say i am against anyone having more than one user name at a time and using that to support their own posts...i find that utterly weird!

I have only been responding to the poster who believes man walked on the moon...he offers no proof other than they did...it means nothing to me one way or the other as i know what i believe and i wont be buying any moon rock.

No I dont get the Dylan ref not being much of a fan but here is a bit from REM

"If you believed they put a man on the moon, man on the moon
If you believe there's nothing up his sleeve, then nothing is cool"

Truth is you either believe or your dont or you dont care. Two of those options apply to me.

Just for the record: I have only ever been me.

Im me! You must be you!

so to the uninitiated not participating in the love-in - can you explain what's the rumpus?

Asbo - you don't want to know, trust me.
.
Incidentally, why has half the string been deleted?

beyond the valley of the asbos wrote:
i have no clue mon ami. it was all pretty tame stuff too. one of my comments that was removed was "lol - that's more like it"!!! it seems the bar keeps getting lowered. complaints are driven by grudge rather than offence these days.

Soouthchurch59 wrote:
The removal of posts seems haphazard at best. I have never complained, never had a message from the echo, but have still had plenty of pretty innocuous posts removed.

There seems to be very little consistency involved.....

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

beyond the valley of the asbos wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote: Good. Yes, I did notice that. It could have got very crowded and confusing for the pair of you with both of you posting on the same thread at the same time. You might have met yourself coming back. Yes, the thread has been deleted. Certainly nothing to do with me, you? So you are saying that you were never on the string about litter wardens being abolished in Basildon?. So it was'nt you who reacted to the poster j-w when he missed the "s" of the word spike, that was a faker? It was'nt you who reacted when doeasilikey said Stanley was back, that was another faker? Oh Dear, Oh dear. As a quick memory refresher (yes, some people have got them)- it was me who challenged your ID. I responded to the poster Soothchurch59, who had said something about Buddha, with a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth, (what you believe is real). Then suddenly I was taking to you! Naturally I asked if you had forgotten to change your login. During your response, you said that you had "not noticed the poster Soothchurch59 before" On checking, i found that he had been in close support to you over the last three threads that you had been on. Even more astonishing was that 40 minutes before your "i never noticed him" post, you had double quoted each other with a message about double accounts and split personalities needing mental health care!!! Now do you understand? Should i take a print before this string is deleted? == You have been talking about moon fakery all over this site, if you don't understand the Dylan reference i can't help you?

I have jettisoned E-types, it is getting too problematic to keep it, not only for me but for others who have been confused by the name and the person who likes to copy it. Now i know what thread you mean and who you mean. I thought you were talking about that young poster who came on the thread and was posting good sense and who suggested most of the posters on the tread were trolls! The poster you mention did indeed post what you say he did, and i felt that was purposely done to invite the comments that invariably followed. If he had said that wasn't the case then i would of accepted that but he didn't, or as far as i know as i left the thread long before it was locked. I was not concentrating on Soothchurch and didn't even know there was two until you pointed it out. I dont think he was supporting me i think he was just being neutral in not attacking me for the sake of culture. I attended a do in London where there was all different cultures and the thing that struck me was how all just accepted that we were all the same under the cultural skin. I really do believe that those who cant accept this are less evolved mentally than those who do. I assure you i am not Soouthchurch nor Southchurch and i would say i am against anyone having more than one user name at a time and using that to support their own posts...i find that utterly weird! I have only been responding to the poster who believes man walked on the moon...he offers no proof other than they did...it means nothing to me one way or the other as i know what i believe and i wont be buying any moon rock. No I dont get the Dylan ref not being much of a fan but here is a bit from REM "If you believed they put a man on the moon, man on the moon If you believe there's nothing up his sleeve, then nothing is cool" Truth is you either believe or your dont or you dont care. Two of those options apply to me.

Just for the record: I have only ever been me.

Im me! You must be you!

so to the uninitiated not participating in the love-in - can you explain what's the rumpus?

Asbo - you don't want to know, trust me. . Incidentally, why has half the string been deleted?

Id like to know whats been going on and you seem to be the only one who knows...

Alekhine wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

beyond the valley of the asbos wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote: Good. Yes, I did notice that. It could have got very crowded and confusing for the pair of you with both of you posting on the same thread at the same time. You might have met yourself coming back. Yes, the thread has been deleted. Certainly nothing to do with me, you? So you are saying that you were never on the string about litter wardens being abolished in Basildon?. So it was'nt you who reacted to the poster j-w when he missed the "s" of the word spike, that was a faker? It was'nt you who reacted when doeasilikey said Stanley was back, that was another faker? Oh Dear, Oh dear. As a quick memory refresher (yes, some people have got them)- it was me who challenged your ID. I responded to the poster Soothchurch59, who had said something about Buddha, with a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth, (what you believe is real). Then suddenly I was taking to you! Naturally I asked if you had forgotten to change your login. During your response, you said that you had "not noticed the poster Soothchurch59 before" On checking, i found that he had been in close support to you over the last three threads that you had been on. Even more astonishing was that 40 minutes before your "i never noticed him" post, you had double quoted each other with a message about double accounts and split personalities needing mental health care!!! Now do you understand? Should i take a print before this string is deleted? == You have been talking about moon fakery all over this site, if you don't understand the Dylan reference i can't help you?

I have jettisoned E-types, it is getting too problematic to keep it, not only for me but for others who have been confused by the name and the person who likes to copy it. Now i know what thread you mean and who you mean. I thought you were talking about that young poster who came on the thread and was posting good sense and who suggested most of the posters on the tread were trolls! The poster you mention did indeed post what you say he did, and i felt that was purposely done to invite the comments that invariably followed. If he had said that wasn't the case then i would of accepted that but he didn't, or as far as i know as i left the thread long before it was locked. I was not concentrating on Soothchurch and didn't even know there was two until you pointed it out. I dont think he was supporting me i think he was just being neutral in not attacking me for the sake of culture. I attended a do in London where there was all different cultures and the thing that struck me was how all just accepted that we were all the same under the cultural skin. I really do believe that those who cant accept this are less evolved mentally than those who do. I assure you i am not Soouthchurch nor Southchurch and i would say i am against anyone having more than one user name at a time and using that to support their own posts...i find that utterly weird! I have only been responding to the poster who believes man walked on the moon...he offers no proof other than they did...it means nothing to me one way or the other as i know what i believe and i wont be buying any moon rock. No I dont get the Dylan ref not being much of a fan but here is a bit from REM "If you believed they put a man on the moon, man on the moon If you believe there's nothing up his sleeve, then nothing is cool" Truth is you either believe or your dont or you dont care. Two of those options apply to me.

Just for the record: I have only ever been me.

Im me! You must be you!

so to the uninitiated not participating in the love-in - can you explain what's the rumpus?

Asbo - you don't want to know, trust me. . Incidentally, why has half the string been deleted?

Id like to know whats been going on and you seem to be the only one who knows...

I'm not entirely sure, but now believe you are right, this whole thing was a set up.

It simply never occured to me that someone might support you, Peter Beardsley style, over 3 strings inevitably drawing a question over your ID.

Maybe he should take his own advice on onanism.

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

beyond the valley of the asbos wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote: Good. Yes, I did notice that. It could have got very crowded and confusing for the pair of you with both of you posting on the same thread at the same time. You might have met yourself coming back. Yes, the thread has been deleted. Certainly nothing to do with me, you? So you are saying that you were never on the string about litter wardens being abolished in Basildon?. So it was'nt you who reacted to the poster j-w when he missed the "s" of the word spike, that was a faker? It was'nt you who reacted when doeasilikey said Stanley was back, that was another faker? Oh Dear, Oh dear. As a quick memory refresher (yes, some people have got them)- it was me who challenged your ID. I responded to the poster Soothchurch59, who had said something about Buddha, with a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth, (what you believe is real). Then suddenly I was taking to you! Naturally I asked if you had forgotten to change your login. During your response, you said that you had "not noticed the poster Soothchurch59 before" On checking, i found that he had been in close support to you over the last three threads that you had been on. Even more astonishing was that 40 minutes before your "i never noticed him" post, you had double quoted each other with a message about double accounts and split personalities needing mental health care!!! Now do you understand? Should i take a print before this string is deleted? == You have been talking about moon fakery all over this site, if you don't understand the Dylan reference i can't help you?

I have jettisoned E-types, it is getting too problematic to keep it, not only for me but for others who have been confused by the name and the person who likes to copy it. Now i know what thread you mean and who you mean. I thought you were talking about that young poster who came on the thread and was posting good sense and who suggested most of the posters on the tread were trolls! The poster you mention did indeed post what you say he did, and i felt that was purposely done to invite the comments that invariably followed. If he had said that wasn't the case then i would of accepted that but he didn't, or as far as i know as i left the thread long before it was locked. I was not concentrating on Soothchurch and didn't even know there was two until you pointed it out. I dont think he was supporting me i think he was just being neutral in not attacking me for the sake of culture. I attended a do in London where there was all different cultures and the thing that struck me was how all just accepted that we were all the same under the cultural skin. I really do believe that those who cant accept this are less evolved mentally than those who do. I assure you i am not Soouthchurch nor Southchurch and i would say i am against anyone having more than one user name at a time and using that to support their own posts...i find that utterly weird! I have only been responding to the poster who believes man walked on the moon...he offers no proof other than they did...it means nothing to me one way or the other as i know what i believe and i wont be buying any moon rock. No I dont get the Dylan ref not being much of a fan but here is a bit from REM "If you believed they put a man on the moon, man on the moon If you believe there's nothing up his sleeve, then nothing is cool" Truth is you either believe or your dont or you dont care. Two of those options apply to me.

Just for the record: I have only ever been me.

Im me! You must be you!

so to the uninitiated not participating in the love-in - can you explain what's the rumpus?

Asbo - you don't want to know, trust me. . Incidentally, why has half the string been deleted?

Id like to know whats been going on and you seem to be the only one who knows...

I'm not entirely sure, but now believe you are right, this whole thing was a set up.

It simply never occured to me that someone might support you, Peter Beardsley style, over 3 strings inevitably drawing a question over your ID.

Maybe he should take his own advice on onanism.

Thank you for that penetrating analysis but I'm not altogether sure what you're trying to say/imply/ or accuse me of.

I'm guessing you have some idea?

Alekhine wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

beyond the valley of the asbos wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote: Good. Yes, I did notice that. It could have got very crowded and confusing for the pair of you with both of you posting on the same thread at the same time. You might have met yourself coming back. Yes, the thread has been deleted. Certainly nothing to do with me, you? So you are saying that you were never on the string about litter wardens being abolished in Basildon?. So it was'nt you who reacted to the poster j-w when he missed the "s" of the word spike, that was a faker? It was'nt you who reacted when doeasilikey said Stanley was back, that was another faker? Oh Dear, Oh dear. As a quick memory refresher (yes, some people have got them)- it was me who challenged your ID. I responded to the poster Soothchurch59, who had said something about Buddha, with a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth, (what you believe is real). Then suddenly I was taking to you! Naturally I asked if you had forgotten to change your login. During your response, you said that you had "not noticed the poster Soothchurch59 before" On checking, i found that he had been in close support to you over the last three threads that you had been on. Even more astonishing was that 40 minutes before your "i never noticed him" post, you had double quoted each other with a message about double accounts and split personalities needing mental health care!!! Now do you understand? Should i take a print before this string is deleted? == You have been talking about moon fakery all over this site, if you don't understand the Dylan reference i can't help you?

I have jettisoned E-types, it is getting too problematic to keep it, not only for me but for others who have been confused by the name and the person who likes to copy it. Now i know what thread you mean and who you mean. I thought you were talking about that young poster who came on the thread and was posting good sense and who suggested most of the posters on the tread were trolls! The poster you mention did indeed post what you say he did, and i felt that was purposely done to invite the comments that invariably followed. If he had said that wasn't the case then i would of accepted that but he didn't, or as far as i know as i left the thread long before it was locked. I was not concentrating on Soothchurch and didn't even know there was two until you pointed it out. I dont think he was supporting me i think he was just being neutral in not attacking me for the sake of culture. I attended a do in London where there was all different cultures and the thing that struck me was how all just accepted that we were all the same under the cultural skin. I really do believe that those who cant accept this are less evolved mentally than those who do. I assure you i am not Soouthchurch nor Southchurch and i would say i am against anyone having more than one user name at a time and using that to support their own posts...i find that utterly weird! I have only been responding to the poster who believes man walked on the moon...he offers no proof other than they did...it means nothing to me one way or the other as i know what i believe and i wont be buying any moon rock. No I dont get the Dylan ref not being much of a fan but here is a bit from REM "If you believed they put a man on the moon, man on the moon If you believe there's nothing up his sleeve, then nothing is cool" Truth is you either believe or your dont or you dont care. Two of those options apply to me.

Just for the record: I have only ever been me.

Im me! You must be you!

so to the uninitiated not participating in the love-in - can you explain what's the rumpus?

Asbo - you don't want to know, trust me. . Incidentally, why has half the string been deleted?

Id like to know whats been going on and you seem to be the only one who knows...

I'm not entirely sure, but now believe you are right, this whole thing was a set up.

It simply never occured to me that someone might support you, Peter Beardsley style, over 3 strings inevitably drawing a question over your ID.

Maybe he should take his own advice on onanism.

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

beyond the valley of the asbos wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote: Good. Yes, I did notice that. It could have got very crowded and confusing for the pair of you with both of you posting on the same thread at the same time. You might have met yourself coming back. Yes, the thread has been deleted. Certainly nothing to do with me, you? So you are saying that you were never on the string about litter wardens being abolished in Basildon?. So it was'nt you who reacted to the poster j-w when he missed the "s" of the word spike, that was a faker? It was'nt you who reacted when doeasilikey said Stanley was back, that was another faker? Oh Dear, Oh dear. As a quick memory refresher (yes, some people have got them)- it was me who challenged your ID. I responded to the poster Soothchurch59, who had said something about Buddha, with a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth, (what you believe is real). Then suddenly I was taking to you! Naturally I asked if you had forgotten to change your login. During your response, you said that you had "not noticed the poster Soothchurch59 before" On checking, i found that he had been in close support to you over the last three threads that you had been on. Even more astonishing was that 40 minutes before your "i never noticed him" post, you had double quoted each other with a message about double accounts and split personalities needing mental health care!!! Now do you understand? Should i take a print before this string is deleted? == You have been talking about moon fakery all over this site, if you don't understand the Dylan reference i can't help you?

I have jettisoned E-types, it is getting too problematic to keep it, not only for me but for others who have been confused by the name and the person who likes to copy it. Now i know what thread you mean and who you mean. I thought you were talking about that young poster who came on the thread and was posting good sense and who suggested most of the posters on the tread were trolls! The poster you mention did indeed post what you say he did, and i felt that was purposely done to invite the comments that invariably followed. If he had said that wasn't the case then i would of accepted that but he didn't, or as far as i know as i left the thread long before it was locked. I was not concentrating on Soothchurch and didn't even know there was two until you pointed it out. I dont think he was supporting me i think he was just being neutral in not attacking me for the sake of culture. I attended a do in London where there was all different cultures and the thing that struck me was how all just accepted that we were all the same under the cultural skin. I really do believe that those who cant accept this are less evolved mentally than those who do. I assure you i am not Soouthchurch nor Southchurch and i would say i am against anyone having more than one user name at a time and using that to support their own posts...i find that utterly weird! I have only been responding to the poster who believes man walked on the moon...he offers no proof other than they did...it means nothing to me one way or the other as i know what i believe and i wont be buying any moon rock. No I dont get the Dylan ref not being much of a fan but here is a bit from REM "If you believed they put a man on the moon, man on the moon If you believe there's nothing up his sleeve, then nothing is cool" Truth is you either believe or your dont or you dont care. Two of those options apply to me.

Just for the record: I have only ever been me.

Im me! You must be you!

so to the uninitiated not participating in the love-in - can you explain what's the rumpus?

Asbo - you don't want to know, trust me. . Incidentally, why has half the string been deleted?

Id like to know whats been going on and you seem to be the only one who knows...

I'm not entirely sure, but now believe you are right, this whole thing was a set up.

It simply never occured to me that someone might support you, Peter Beardsley style, over 3 strings inevitably drawing a question over your ID.

Maybe he should take his own advice on onanism.

Why do you feel that a poster, who might see another poster commenting on something he agrees with, is behaving in a strange way?

Peter Beadsley? Bob Dylan? Its all becoming a little bizarre.

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

beyond the valley of the asbos wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote: Good. Yes, I did notice that. It could have got very crowded and confusing for the pair of you with both of you posting on the same thread at the same time. You might have met yourself coming back. Yes, the thread has been deleted. Certainly nothing to do with me, you? So you are saying that you were never on the string about litter wardens being abolished in Basildon?. So it was'nt you who reacted to the poster j-w when he missed the "s" of the word spike, that was a faker? It was'nt you who reacted when doeasilikey said Stanley was back, that was another faker? Oh Dear, Oh dear. As a quick memory refresher (yes, some people have got them)- it was me who challenged your ID. I responded to the poster Soothchurch59, who had said something about Buddha, with a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth, (what you believe is real). Then suddenly I was taking to you! Naturally I asked if you had forgotten to change your login. During your response, you said that you had "not noticed the poster Soothchurch59 before" On checking, i found that he had been in close support to you over the last three threads that you had been on. Even more astonishing was that 40 minutes before your "i never noticed him" post, you had double quoted each other with a message about double accounts and split personalities needing mental health care!!! Now do you understand? Should i take a print before this string is deleted? == You have been talking about moon fakery all over this site, if you don't understand the Dylan reference i can't help you?

I have jettisoned E-types, it is getting too problematic to keep it, not only for me but for others who have been confused by the name and the person who likes to copy it. Now i know what thread you mean and who you mean. I thought you were talking about that young poster who came on the thread and was posting good sense and who suggested most of the posters on the tread were trolls! The poster you mention did indeed post what you say he did, and i felt that was purposely done to invite the comments that invariably followed. If he had said that wasn't the case then i would of accepted that but he didn't, or as far as i know as i left the thread long before it was locked. I was not concentrating on Soothchurch and didn't even know there was two until you pointed it out. I dont think he was supporting me i think he was just being neutral in not attacking me for the sake of culture. I attended a do in London where there was all different cultures and the thing that struck me was how all just accepted that we were all the same under the cultural skin. I really do believe that those who cant accept this are less evolved mentally than those who do. I assure you i am not Soouthchurch nor Southchurch and i would say i am against anyone having more than one user name at a time and using that to support their own posts...i find that utterly weird! I have only been responding to the poster who believes man walked on the moon...he offers no proof other than they did...it means nothing to me one way or the other as i know what i believe and i wont be buying any moon rock. No I dont get the Dylan ref not being much of a fan but here is a bit from REM "If you believed they put a man on the moon, man on the moon If you believe there's nothing up his sleeve, then nothing is cool" Truth is you either believe or your dont or you dont care. Two of those options apply to me.

Just for the record: I have only ever been me.

Im me! You must be you!

so to the uninitiated not participating in the love-in - can you explain what's the rumpus?

Asbo - you don't want to know, trust me. . Incidentally, why has half the string been deleted?

Id like to know whats been going on and you seem to be the only one who knows...

I'm not entirely sure, but now believe you are right, this whole thing was a set up.

It simply never occured to me that someone might support you, Peter Beardsley style, over 3 strings inevitably drawing a question over your ID.

Maybe he should take his own advice on onanism.

Thank you for that penetrating analysis but I'm not altogether sure what you're trying to say/imply/ or accuse me of.

I'm guessing you have some idea?

Are you actually saying that just because I go against the grain when it comes to the usual bigotry being bandied about, that I am somehow trying to 'fit up' another poster!!???

If so, you're more stupid than you would like to have us believe.

beyond the valley of the asbos wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

beyond the valley of the asbos wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote: Good. Yes, I did notice that. It could have got very crowded and confusing for the pair of you with both of you posting on the same thread at the same time. You might have met yourself coming back. Yes, the thread has been deleted. Certainly nothing to do with me, you? So you are saying that you were never on the string about litter wardens being abolished in Basildon?. So it was'nt you who reacted to the poster j-w when he missed the "s" of the word spike, that was a faker? It was'nt you who reacted when doeasilikey said Stanley was back, that was another faker? Oh Dear, Oh dear. As a quick memory refresher (yes, some people have got them)- it was me who challenged your ID. I responded to the poster Soothchurch59, who had said something about Buddha, with a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth, (what you believe is real). Then suddenly I was taking to you! Naturally I asked if you had forgotten to change your login. During your response, you said that you had "not noticed the poster Soothchurch59 before" On checking, i found that he had been in close support to you over the last three threads that you had been on. Even more astonishing was that 40 minutes before your "i never noticed him" post, you had double quoted each other with a message about double accounts and split personalities needing mental health care!!! Now do you understand? Should i take a print before this string is deleted? == You have been talking about moon fakery all over this site, if you don't understand the Dylan reference i can't help you?

I have jettisoned E-types, it is getting too problematic to keep it, not only for me but for others who have been confused by the name and the person who likes to copy it. Now i know what thread you mean and who you mean. I thought you were talking about that young poster who came on the thread and was posting good sense and who suggested most of the posters on the tread were trolls! The poster you mention did indeed post what you say he did, and i felt that was purposely done to invite the comments that invariably followed. If he had said that wasn't the case then i would of accepted that but he didn't, or as far as i know as i left the thread long before it was locked. I was not concentrating on Soothchurch and didn't even know there was two until you pointed it out. I dont think he was supporting me i think he was just being neutral in not attacking me for the sake of culture. I attended a do in London where there was all different cultures and the thing that struck me was how all just accepted that we were all the same under the cultural skin. I really do believe that those who cant accept this are less evolved mentally than those who do. I assure you i am not Soouthchurch nor Southchurch and i would say i am against anyone having more than one user name at a time and using that to support their own posts...i find that utterly weird! I have only been responding to the poster who believes man walked on the moon...he offers no proof other than they did...it means nothing to me one way or the other as i know what i believe and i wont be buying any moon rock. No I dont get the Dylan ref not being much of a fan but here is a bit from REM "If you believed they put a man on the moon, man on the moon If you believe there's nothing up his sleeve, then nothing is cool" Truth is you either believe or your dont or you dont care. Two of those options apply to me.

Just for the record: I have only ever been me.

Im me! You must be you!

so to the uninitiated not participating in the love-in - can you explain what's the rumpus?

Asbo - you don't want to know, trust me. . Incidentally, why has half the string been deleted?

Id like to know whats been going on and you seem to be the only one who knows...

I'm not entirely sure, but now believe you are right, this whole thing was a set up.

It simply never occured to me that someone might support you, Peter Beardsley style, over 3 strings inevitably drawing a question over your ID.

Maybe he should take his own advice on onanism.

Thank you for that penetrating analysis but I'm not altogether sure what you're trying to say/imply/ or accuse me of.

I'm guessing you have some idea?

Are you actually saying that just because I go against the grain when it comes to the usual bigotry being bandied about, that I am somehow trying to 'fit up' another poster!!???

If so, you're more stupid than you would like to have us believe.

no i think he's saying you're the sultan of onan

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

beyond the valley of the asbos wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

beyond the valley of the asbos wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote: Good. Yes, I did notice that. It could have got very crowded and confusing for the pair of you with both of you posting on the same thread at the same time. You might have met yourself coming back. Yes, the thread has been deleted. Certainly nothing to do with me, you? So you are saying that you were never on the string about litter wardens being abolished in Basildon?. So it was'nt you who reacted to the poster j-w when he missed the "s" of the word spike, that was a faker? It was'nt you who reacted when doeasilikey said Stanley was back, that was another faker? Oh Dear, Oh dear. As a quick memory refresher (yes, some people have got them)- it was me who challenged your ID. I responded to the poster Soothchurch59, who had said something about Buddha, with a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth, (what you believe is real). Then suddenly I was taking to you! Naturally I asked if you had forgotten to change your login. During your response, you said that you had "not noticed the poster Soothchurch59 before" On checking, i found that he had been in close support to you over the last three threads that you had been on. Even more astonishing was that 40 minutes before your "i never noticed him" post, you had double quoted each other with a message about double accounts and split personalities needing mental health care!!! Now do you understand? Should i take a print before this string is deleted? == You have been talking about moon fakery all over this site, if you don't understand the Dylan reference i can't help you?

I have jettisoned E-types, it is getting too problematic to keep it, not only for me but for others who have been confused by the name and the person who likes to copy it. Now i know what thread you mean and who you mean. I thought you were talking about that young poster who came on the thread and was posting good sense and who suggested most of the posters on the tread were trolls! The poster you mention did indeed post what you say he did, and i felt that was purposely done to invite the comments that invariably followed. If he had said that wasn't the case then i would of accepted that but he didn't, or as far as i know as i left the thread long before it was locked. I was not concentrating on Soothchurch and didn't even know there was two until you pointed it out. I dont think he was supporting me i think he was just being neutral in not attacking me for the sake of culture. I attended a do in London where there was all different cultures and the thing that struck me was how all just accepted that we were all the same under the cultural skin. I really do believe that those who cant accept this are less evolved mentally than those who do. I assure you i am not Soouthchurch nor Southchurch and i would say i am against anyone having more than one user name at a time and using that to support their own posts...i find that utterly weird! I have only been responding to the poster who believes man walked on the moon...he offers no proof other than they did...it means nothing to me one way or the other as i know what i believe and i wont be buying any moon rock. No I dont get the Dylan ref not being much of a fan but here is a bit from REM "If you believed they put a man on the moon, man on the moon If you believe there's nothing up his sleeve, then nothing is cool" Truth is you either believe or your dont or you dont care. Two of those options apply to me.

Just for the record: I have only ever been me.

Im me! You must be you!

so to the uninitiated not participating in the love-in - can you explain what's the rumpus?

Asbo - you don't want to know, trust me. . Incidentally, why has half the string been deleted?

Id like to know whats been going on and you seem to be the only one who knows...

I'm not entirely sure, but now believe you are right, this whole thing was a set up. It simply never occured to me that someone might support you, Peter Beardsley style, over 3 strings inevitably drawing a question over your ID. Maybe he should take his own advice on onanism.

Thank you for that penetrating analysis but I'm not altogether sure what you're trying to say/imply/ or accuse me of. I'm guessing you have some idea?

Are you actually saying that just because I go against the grain when it comes to the usual bigotry being bandied about, that I am somehow trying to 'fit up' another poster!!??? If so, you're more stupid than you would like to have us believe.

no i think he's saying you're the sultan of onan

Its always satisfying to add to someones lexicon,

Alekhine wrote:
Don't kick it off again ET. This is what you said in one of your posts above.

qte

The poster you mention did indeed post what you say he did, and i felt that was purposely done to invite the comments that invariably followed. If he had said that wasn't the case then i would of accepted that but he didn't, or as far as i know as i left the thread long before it was locked.

unqte

Why do YOU feel that a poster, who might see another poster commenting on something he agrees with is behaving in a strange way?

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

beyond the valley of the asbos wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

beyond the valley of the asbos wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote: Good. Yes, I did notice that. It could have got very crowded and confusing for the pair of you with both of you posting on the same thread at the same time. You might have met yourself coming back. Yes, the thread has been deleted. Certainly nothing to do with me, you? So you are saying that you were never on the string about litter wardens being abolished in Basildon?. So it was'nt you who reacted to the poster j-w when he missed the "s" of the word spike, that was a faker? It was'nt you who reacted when doeasilikey said Stanley was back, that was another faker? Oh Dear, Oh dear. As a quick memory refresher (yes, some people have got them)- it was me who challenged your ID. I responded to the poster Soothchurch59, who had said something about Buddha, with a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth, (what you believe is real). Then suddenly I was taking to you! Naturally I asked if you had forgotten to change your login. During your response, you said that you had "not noticed the poster Soothchurch59 before" On checking, i found that he had been in close support to you over the last three threads that you had been on. Even more astonishing was that 40 minutes before your "i never noticed him" post, you had double quoted each other with a message about double accounts and split personalities needing mental health care!!! Now do you understand? Should i take a print before this string is deleted? == You have been talking about moon fakery all over this site, if you don't understand the Dylan reference i can't help you?

I have jettisoned E-types, it is getting too problematic to keep it, not only for me but for others who have been confused by the name and the person who likes to copy it. Now i know what thread you mean and who you mean. I thought you were talking about that young poster who came on the thread and was posting good sense and who suggested most of the posters on the tread were trolls! The poster you mention did indeed post what you say he did, and i felt that was purposely done to invite the comments that invariably followed. If he had said that wasn't the case then i would of accepted that but he didn't, or as far as i know as i left the thread long before it was locked. I was not concentrating on Soothchurch and didn't even know there was two until you pointed it out. I dont think he was supporting me i think he was just being neutral in not attacking me for the sake of culture. I attended a do in London where there was all different cultures and the thing that struck me was how all just accepted that we were all the same under the cultural skin. I really do believe that those who cant accept this are less evolved mentally than those who do. I assure you i am not Soouthchurch nor Southchurch and i would say i am against anyone having more than one user name at a time and using that to support their own posts...i find that utterly weird! I have only been responding to the poster who believes man walked on the moon...he offers no proof other than they did...it means nothing to me one way or the other as i know what i believe and i wont be buying any moon rock. No I dont get the Dylan ref not being much of a fan but here is a bit from REM "If you believed they put a man on the moon, man on the moon If you believe there's nothing up his sleeve, then nothing is cool" Truth is you either believe or your dont or you dont care. Two of those options apply to me.

Just for the record: I have only ever been me.

Im me! You must be you!

so to the uninitiated not participating in the love-in - can you explain what's the rumpus?

Asbo - you don't want to know, trust me. . Incidentally, why has half the string been deleted?

Id like to know whats been going on and you seem to be the only one who knows...

I'm not entirely sure, but now believe you are right, this whole thing was a set up. It simply never occured to me that someone might support you, Peter Beardsley style, over 3 strings inevitably drawing a question over your ID. Maybe he should take his own advice on onanism.

Thank you for that penetrating analysis but I'm not altogether sure what you're trying to say/imply/ or accuse me of. I'm guessing you have some idea?

Are you actually saying that just because I go against the grain when it comes to the usual bigotry being bandied about, that I am somehow trying to 'fit up' another poster!!??? If so, you're more stupid than you would like to have us believe.

no i think he's saying you're the sultan of onan

Its always satisfying to add to someones lexicon,

.....and now the double ID is as plain as a pike staff.

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

beyond the valley of the asbos wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

beyond the valley of the asbos wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote: Good. Yes, I did notice that. It could have got very crowded and confusing for the pair of you with both of you posting on the same thread at the same time. You might have met yourself coming back. Yes, the thread has been deleted. Certainly nothing to do with me, you? So you are saying that you were never on the string about litter wardens being abolished in Basildon?. So it was'nt you who reacted to the poster j-w when he missed the "s" of the word spike, that was a faker? It was'nt you who reacted when doeasilikey said Stanley was back, that was another faker? Oh Dear, Oh dear. As a quick memory refresher (yes, some people have got them)- it was me who challenged your ID. I responded to the poster Soothchurch59, who had said something about Buddha, with a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth, (what you believe is real). Then suddenly I was taking to you! Naturally I asked if you had forgotten to change your login. During your response, you said that you had "not noticed the poster Soothchurch59 before" On checking, i found that he had been in close support to you over the last three threads that you had been on. Even more astonishing was that 40 minutes before your "i never noticed him" post, you had double quoted each other with a message about double accounts and split personalities needing mental health care!!! Now do you understand? Should i take a print before this string is deleted? == You have been talking about moon fakery all over this site, if you don't understand the Dylan reference i can't help you?

I have jettisoned E-types, it is getting too problematic to keep it, not only for me but for others who have been confused by the name and the person who likes to copy it. Now i know what thread you mean and who you mean. I thought you were talking about that young poster who came on the thread and was posting good sense and who suggested most of the posters on the tread were trolls! The poster you mention did indeed post what you say he did, and i felt that was purposely done to invite the comments that invariably followed. If he had said that wasn't the case then i would of accepted that but he didn't, or as far as i know as i left the thread long before it was locked. I was not concentrating on Soothchurch and didn't even know there was two until you pointed it out. I dont think he was supporting me i think he was just being neutral in not attacking me for the sake of culture. I attended a do in London where there was all different cultures and the thing that struck me was how all just accepted that we were all the same under the cultural skin. I really do believe that those who cant accept this are less evolved mentally than those who do. I assure you i am not Soouthchurch nor Southchurch and i would say i am against anyone having more than one user name at a time and using that to support their own posts...i find that utterly weird! I have only been responding to the poster who believes man walked on the moon...he offers no proof other than they did...it means nothing to me one way or the other as i know what i believe and i wont be buying any moon rock. No I dont get the Dylan ref not being much of a fan but here is a bit from REM "If you believed they put a man on the moon, man on the moon If you believe there's nothing up his sleeve, then nothing is cool" Truth is you either believe or your dont or you dont care. Two of those options apply to me.

Just for the record: I have only ever been me.

Im me! You must be you!

so to the uninitiated not participating in the love-in - can you explain what's the rumpus?

Asbo - you don't want to know, trust me. . Incidentally, why has half the string been deleted?

Id like to know whats been going on and you seem to be the only one who knows...

I'm not entirely sure, but now believe you are right, this whole thing was a set up. It simply never occured to me that someone might support you, Peter Beardsley style, over 3 strings inevitably drawing a question over your ID. Maybe he should take his own advice on onanism.

Thank you for that penetrating analysis but I'm not altogether sure what you're trying to say/imply/ or accuse me of. I'm guessing you have some idea?

Are you actually saying that just because I go against the grain when it comes to the usual bigotry being bandied about, that I am somehow trying to 'fit up' another poster!!??? If so, you're more stupid than you would like to have us believe.

no i think he's saying you're the sultan of onan

Its always satisfying to add to someones lexicon,

.....and now the double ID is as plain as a pike staff.

Silly little person, see how you dont fit in when people are bantering without pure malice?

Alekhine wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

beyond the valley of the asbos wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

beyond the valley of the asbos wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote: Good. Yes, I did notice that. It could have got very crowded and confusing for the pair of you with both of you posting on the same thread at the same time. You might have met yourself coming back. Yes, the thread has been deleted. Certainly nothing to do with me, you? So you are saying that you were never on the string about litter wardens being abolished in Basildon?. So it was'nt you who reacted to the poster j-w when he missed the "s" of the word spike, that was a faker? It was'nt you who reacted when doeasilikey said Stanley was back, that was another faker? Oh Dear, Oh dear. As a quick memory refresher (yes, some people have got them)- it was me who challenged your ID. I responded to the poster Soothchurch59, who had said something about Buddha, with a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth, (what you believe is real). Then suddenly I was taking to you! Naturally I asked if you had forgotten to change your login. During your response, you said that you had "not noticed the poster Soothchurch59 before" On checking, i found that he had been in close support to you over the last three threads that you had been on. Even more astonishing was that 40 minutes before your "i never noticed him" post, you had double quoted each other with a message about double accounts and split personalities needing mental health care!!! Now do you understand? Should i take a print before this string is deleted? == You have been talking about moon fakery all over this site, if you don't understand the Dylan reference i can't help you?

I have jettisoned E-types, it is getting too problematic to keep it, not only for me but for others who have been confused by the name and the person who likes to copy it. Now i know what thread you mean and who you mean. I thought you were talking about that young poster who came on the thread and was posting good sense and who suggested most of the posters on the tread were trolls! The poster you mention did indeed post what you say he did, and i felt that was purposely done to invite the comments that invariably followed. If he had said that wasn't the case then i would of accepted that but he didn't, or as far as i know as i left the thread long before it was locked. I was not concentrating on Soothchurch and didn't even know there was two until you pointed it out. I dont think he was supporting me i think he was just being neutral in not attacking me for the sake of culture. I attended a do in London where there was all different cultures and the thing that struck me was how all just accepted that we were all the same under the cultural skin. I really do believe that those who cant accept this are less evolved mentally than those who do. I assure you i am not Soouthchurch nor Southchurch and i would say i am against anyone having more than one user name at a time and using that to support their own posts...i find that utterly weird! I have only been responding to the poster who believes man walked on the moon...he offers no proof other than they did...it means nothing to me one way or the other as i know what i believe and i wont be buying any moon rock. No I dont get the Dylan ref not being much of a fan but here is a bit from REM "If you believed they put a man on the moon, man on the moon If you believe there's nothing up his sleeve, then nothing is cool" Truth is you either believe or your dont or you dont care. Two of those options apply to me.

Just for the record: I have only ever been me.

Im me! You must be you!

so to the uninitiated not participating in the love-in - can you explain what's the rumpus?

Asbo - you don't want to know, trust me. . Incidentally, why has half the string been deleted?

Id like to know whats been going on and you seem to be the only one who knows...

I'm not entirely sure, but now believe you are right, this whole thing was a set up. It simply never occured to me that someone might support you, Peter Beardsley style, over 3 strings inevitably drawing a question over your ID. Maybe he should take his own advice on onanism.

Thank you for that penetrating analysis but I'm not altogether sure what you're trying to say/imply/ or accuse me of. I'm guessing you have some idea?

Are you actually saying that just because I go against the grain when it comes to the usual bigotry being bandied about, that I am somehow trying to 'fit up' another poster!!??? If so, you're more stupid than you would like to have us believe.

no i think he's saying you're the sultan of onan

Its always satisfying to add to someones lexicon,

.....and now the double ID is as plain as a pike staff.

Silly little person, see how you dont fit in when people are bantering without pure malice?

It is you that does not fit in.

Nobody else needs a double ID for banter, except for some of the people you continually call racist. You have now proved yourself to be no different.

Were you feeling lonely or is there some deeper problem? Shall we call Dr Freud?

You said double IDs were a sign of mental illness and then double quoted yourself - lol.

Btw - you still owe yourself an apology from the previous srting.

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

beyond the valley of the asbos wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

beyond the valley of the asbos wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote: Good. Yes, I did notice that. It could have got very crowded and confusing for the pair of you with both of you posting on the same thread at the same time. You might have met yourself coming back. Yes, the thread has been deleted. Certainly nothing to do with me, you? So you are saying that you were never on the string about litter wardens being abolished in Basildon?. So it was'nt you who reacted to the poster j-w when he missed the "s" of the word spike, that was a faker? It was'nt you who reacted when doeasilikey said Stanley was back, that was another faker? Oh Dear, Oh dear. As a quick memory refresher (yes, some people have got them)- it was me who challenged your ID. I responded to the poster Soothchurch59, who had said something about Buddha, with a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth, (what you believe is real). Then suddenly I was taking to you! Naturally I asked if you had forgotten to change your login. During your response, you said that you had "not noticed the poster Soothchurch59 before" On checking, i found that he had been in close support to you over the last three threads that you had been on. Even more astonishing was that 40 minutes before your "i never noticed him" post, you had double quoted each other with a message about double accounts and split personalities needing mental health care!!! Now do you understand? Should i take a print before this string is deleted? == You have been talking about moon fakery all over this site, if you don't understand the Dylan reference i can't help you?

I have jettisoned E-types, it is getting too problematic to keep it, not only for me but for others who have been confused by the name and the person who likes to copy it. Now i know what thread you mean and who you mean. I thought you were talking about that young poster who came on the thread and was posting good sense and who suggested most of the posters on the tread were trolls! The poster you mention did indeed post what you say he did, and i felt that was purposely done to invite the comments that invariably followed. If he had said that wasn't the case then i would of accepted that but he didn't, or as far as i know as i left the thread long before it was locked. I was not concentrating on Soothchurch and didn't even know there was two until you pointed it out. I dont think he was supporting me i think he was just being neutral in not attacking me for the sake of culture. I attended a do in London where there was all different cultures and the thing that struck me was how all just accepted that we were all the same under the cultural skin. I really do believe that those who cant accept this are less evolved mentally than those who do. I assure you i am not Soouthchurch nor Southchurch and i would say i am against anyone having more than one user name at a time and using that to support their own posts...i find that utterly weird! I have only been responding to the poster who believes man walked on the moon...he offers no proof other than they did...it means nothing to me one way or the other as i know what i believe and i wont be buying any moon rock. No I dont get the Dylan ref not being much of a fan but here is a bit from REM "If you believed they put a man on the moon, man on the moon If you believe there's nothing up his sleeve, then nothing is cool" Truth is you either believe or your dont or you dont care. Two of those options apply to me.

Just for the record: I have only ever been me.

Im me! You must be you!

so to the uninitiated not participating in the love-in - can you explain what's the rumpus?

Asbo - you don't want to know, trust me. . Incidentally, why has half the string been deleted?

Id like to know whats been going on and you seem to be the only one who knows...

I'm not entirely sure, but now believe you are right, this whole thing was a set up. It simply never occured to me that someone might support you, Peter Beardsley style, over 3 strings inevitably drawing a question over your ID. Maybe he should take his own advice on onanism.

Thank you for that penetrating analysis but I'm not altogether sure what you're trying to say/imply/ or accuse me of. I'm guessing you have some idea?

Are you actually saying that just because I go against the grain when it comes to the usual bigotry being bandied about, that I am somehow trying to 'fit up' another poster!!??? If so, you're more stupid than you would like to have us believe.

no i think he's saying you're the sultan of onan

Its always satisfying to add to someones lexicon,

.....and now the double ID is as plain as a pike staff.

Silly little person, see how you dont fit in when people are bantering without pure malice?

It is you that does not fit in.

Nobody else needs a double ID for banter, except for some of the people you continually call racist. You have now proved yourself to be no different.

Were you feeling lonely or is there some deeper problem? Shall we call Dr Freud?

You said double IDs were a sign of mental illness and then double quoted yourself - lol.

Btw - you still owe yourself an apology from the previous srting.

Oh dear....

Alekhine wrote:
Posters can draw their own conclusion from the lack of denial at this point.
How did you previously phrase it...oh yes...grow some.

Nebs wrote:

Alekhine wrote:
Posters can draw their own conclusion from the lack of denial at this point.
How did you previously phrase it...oh yes...grow some.

If I could read the thread I might be able to draw some conclusions. At the moment the only conclusion I can draw is that the Echo should remove the facility to quote anything other than one post.

Alekhine wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

beyond the valley of the asbos wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote:

beyond the valley of the asbos wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Soouthchurch59 wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Alekhine wrote: Good. Yes, I did notice that. It could have got very crowded and confusing for the pair of you with both of you posting on the same thread at the same time. You might have met yourself coming back. Yes, the thread has been deleted. Certainly nothing to do with me, you? So you are saying that you were never on the string about litter wardens being abolished in Basildon?. So it was'nt you who reacted to the poster j-w when he missed the "s" of the word spike, that was a faker? It was'nt you who reacted when doeasilikey said Stanley was back, that was another faker? Oh Dear, Oh dear. As a quick memory refresher (yes, some people have got them)- it was me who challenged your ID. I responded to the poster Soothchurch59, who had said something about Buddha, with a quote from the keeper of Buddha's tooth, (what you believe is real). Then suddenly I was taking to you! Naturally I asked if you had forgotten to change your login. During your response, you said that you had "not noticed the poster Soothchurch59 before" On checking, i found that he had been in close support to you over the last three threads that you had been on. Even more astonishing was that 40 minutes before your "i never noticed him" post, you had double quoted each other with a message about double accounts and split personalities needing mental health care!!! Now do you understand? Should i take a print before this string is deleted? == You have been talking about moon fakery all over this site, if you don't understand the Dylan reference i can't help you?

I have jettisoned E-types, it is getting too problematic to keep it, not only for me but for others who have been confused by the name and the person who likes to copy it. Now i know what thread you mean and who you mean. I thought you were talking about that young poster who came on the thread and was posting good sense and who suggested most of the posters on the tread were trolls! The poster you mention did indeed post what you say he did, and i felt that was purposely done to invite the comments that invariably followed. If he had said that wasn't the case then i would of accepted that but he didn't, or as far as i know as i left the thread long before it was locked. I was not concentrating on Soothchurch and didn't even know there was two until you pointed it out. I dont think he was supporting me i think he was just being neutral in not attacking me for the sake of culture. I attended a do in London where there was all different cultures and the thing that struck me was how all just accepted that we were all the same under the cultural skin. I really do believe that those who cant accept this are less evolved mentally than those who do. I assure you i am not Soouthchurch nor Southchurch and i would say i am against anyone having more than one user name at a time and using that to support their own posts...i find that utterly weird! I have only been responding to the poster who believes man walked on the moon...he offers no proof other than they did...it means nothing to me one way or the other as i know what i believe and i wont be buying any moon rock. No I dont get the Dylan ref not being much of a fan but here is a bit from REM "If you believed they put a man on the moon, man on the moon If you believe there's nothing up his sleeve, then nothing is cool" Truth is you either believe or your dont or you dont care. Two of those options apply to me.

Just for the record: I have only ever been me.

Im me! You must be you!

so to the uninitiated not participating in the love-in - can you explain what's the rumpus?

Asbo - you don't want to know, trust me. . Incidentally, why has half the string been deleted?

Id like to know whats been going on and you seem to be the only one who knows...

I'm not entirely sure, but now believe you are right, this whole thing was a set up. It simply never occured to me that someone might support you, Peter Beardsley style, over 3 strings inevitably drawing a question over your ID. Maybe he should take his own advice on onanism.

Thank you for that penetrating analysis but I'm not altogether sure what you're trying to say/imply/ or accuse me of. I'm guessing you have some idea?

Are you actually saying that just because I go against the grain when it comes to the usual bigotry being bandied about, that I am somehow trying to 'fit up' another poster!!??? If so, you're more stupid than you would like to have us believe.

no i think he's saying you're the sultan of onan

Its always satisfying to add to someones lexicon,

.....and now the double ID is as plain as a pike staff.

Silly little person, see how you dont fit in when people are bantering without pure malice?

It is you that does not fit in.

Nobody else needs a double ID for banter, except for some of the people you continually call racist. You have now proved yourself to be no different.

Were you feeling lonely or is there some deeper problem? Shall we call Dr Freud?

You said double IDs were a sign of mental illness and then double quoted yourself - lol.

Btw - you still owe yourself an apology from the previous srting.

Alekhine wrote:
Do I have to borrow one of your devices here and quote my own post?

From somewhere above i said

qte

Don't kick it off again ET.

unqte

But what do you do?

You now suddenly know a lot about a poster who you had not noticed until yesterday when i pointed him out to you.

Very strange, as you seem to have been best buddies for so long.

Not a double ID. - After the twists and turns that you have deliberately put on this, i simply do not believe you.

Btw, plain as a pike staff is a common expression which means something that cannot be disguised.

Who died and appointed you arbitor of the English language?

Alekhine wrote:
Do I have to borrow one of your devices here and quote my own post?

From somewhere above i said

qte

Don't kick it off again ET.

unqte

But what do you do?

You now suddenly know a lot about a poster who you had not noticed until yesterday when i pointed him out to you.

Very strange, as you seem to have been best buddies for so long.

Not a double ID. - After the twists and turns that you have deliberately put on this, i simply do not believe you.

Btw, plain as a pike staff is a common expression which means something that cannot be disguised.

Who died and appointed you arbitor of the English language?

Gina the wee nerd wrote:

Alekhine wrote:
Do I have to borrow one of your devices here and quote my own post?

From somewhere above i said

qte

Don't kick it off again ET.

unqte

But what do you do?

You now suddenly know a lot about a poster who you had not noticed until yesterday when i pointed him out to you.

Very strange, as you seem to have been best buddies for so long.

Not a double ID. - After the twists and turns that you have deliberately put on this, i simply do not believe you.

Btw, plain as a pike staff is a common expression which means something that cannot be disguised.

Who died and appointed you arbitor of the English language?

Abattoir of the English language where ET's concerned.

stropmag. wrote:
In response to EEK A HOUSE and his comment of 4.10pm:

http://en.wikipedia.

org/wiki/Talk%3APike

y#Pikey_and_Didikai_

are_not_Racist

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Gina the wee nerd wrote:

Alekhine wrote:
Do I have to borrow one of your devices here and quote my own post?

From somewhere above i said

qte

Don't kick it off again ET.

unqte

But what do you do?

You now suddenly know a lot about a poster who you had not noticed until yesterday when i pointed him out to you.

Very strange, as you seem to have been best buddies for so long.

Not a double ID. - After the twists and turns that you have deliberately put on this, i simply do not believe you.

Btw, plain as a pike staff is a common expression which means something that cannot be disguised.

Who died and appointed you arbitor of the English language?

Abattoir of the English language where ET's concerned.

I see your name has been changed again...why was that? And of course behind you comes "dada" if indeed it is "dada"

Theres only a very small amount of you hardcore hypocritical racists left on the site and im sure when you have gone people from any community will be able to make comment on the threads without needing to worry about being racially abused and slurred for having the cheek to do so!

stropmag. wrote:

EEK A HOUSE wrote:

Gina the wee nerd wrote:

Alekhine wrote:
Do I have to borrow one of your devices here and quote my own post?

From somewhere above i said

qte

Don't kick it off again ET.

unqte

But what do you do?

You now suddenly know a lot about a poster who you had not noticed until yesterday when i pointed him out to you.

Very strange, as you seem to have been best buddies for so long.

Not a double ID. - After the twists and turns that you have deliberately put on this, i simply do not believe you.

Btw, plain as a pike staff is a common expression which means something that cannot be disguised.

Who died and appointed you arbitor of the English language?

Abattoir of the English language where ET's concerned.

I see your name has been changed again...why was that? And of course behind you comes "dada" if indeed it is "dada"

Theres only a very small amount of you hardcore hypocritical racists left on the site and im sure when you have gone people from any community will be able to make comment on the threads without needing to worry about being racially abused and slurred for having the cheek to do so!

Tampon, Night n Day, Mincer, E-Types with various rearrangements. These are just a few of your previous names. Why were they constantly changing and why now another. What will it be next? Do tell.

Anything to say about the quoted source?:

http://en.wikipedia.


org/wiki/Talk%3APike


y#Pikey_and_Didikai_


are_not_Racist

You always like to have the last word so go ahead.