Union says Southend Council ibrary consultation just a smokescreen for cuts

A UNION has accused Southend Council of launching a review into the future of the borough’s libraries as a smokescreen for reducing the service to save money.

The council is currently reviewing its library services and users are being asked to fill in questionnaires on what changes they would like to see. But with the council looking to make budget cuts, Southend Unison says the review launched last month (oct) may be used “as a cover to make drastic cuts or even close libraries”.

Claire Wormald, secretary of Southend UNISON Local Government Branch, which represents workers in the library service, said: “Libraries are an important free service open to the entire community. That’s why we are urging all residents to stand up for Southend libraries by taking part in Southend Council’s public consultation and firmly state that they will not accept reductions in opening times, staffing levels, or the resources used to provide this key service.

“Cutting library services will be yet another false economy that will store up problems for the future.”

The council, along with the University of Essex and South Essex College, will open a new £30million main town library in Elmer Square next August. The borough has a total of seven libraries but there have been fears over the future of some like Westcliff library.

Nevertheless, Derek Jarvis, Southend councillor responsible for culture, said the union was wrong to question the motives for the consultation and the service now needed to account of increased use of new technology.

He said: “They are overeacting because it has been made absolutely clear we have no preconceived ideas on what users will recommend that we do.

“It’s quite a few years since we have reviewed the service and it’s happening all over the country because of the changing needs of users and also those who don’t use the service. We want to find out what they would like to see.”

Mr Jarvis said the three-month consultation would be in two phases, with the first finding out what people want and the second digesting the findings. 

He added: “We will then come up with views as a result of the consultation but it will be an all-party discussion so it’s not political. Following that there will be another three-months public consultation so it is not being rushed and we are keeping a very open mind on it.”

The consultation ends on January 6 2013. Unison is encouraging library users to play a full part in the consultation to support the service.

Comments(6)

Shirley Burnham says...
1:17pm Fri 2 Nov 12

I take the liberty of posting a comment, even though I don't live in Southend.

It has been my experience that users do not anticipate what *could* be the result of a consultation that they complete in good faith. It is crucial to say so if you do not want paid frontline staff to disappear. Often the manner in which questions are posed can lull one into thinking that the worst cannot happen.

This may well not be the case in Southend but it's worth bearing in mind. A quality public library service is so important - but can't be taken for granted any more.

Remember, a library that is closed more often than it's open, with fewer or no paid staff isn't a library - It's a soulless room with books in it ! Good luck.

perini says...
1:57pm Fri 2 Nov 12

Waste of time - this council has a reputation of riding rough shod over the wishes of their masters - ie Us the local tax payer. If they really were going to listen maybe they would have heard a lot of peole querying why a new library was needed in the first place. OK I understand that the Vic Ave site needed work but it must cost a hell of a lot less to repair than a £30 million new one!

Rochford Rob says...
2:07pm Fri 2 Nov 12

Thirty million quid!!! ??? for a building into which you (basically) store books?? Jeez, you could set up ten Waterstones shops and fill them all for that sort of dosh.

Councils, like governments - good at hosing other peoples' money about.

_champagne2 says...
4:28pm Fri 2 Nov 12

Why does this not surprise me - this town is run by a small group of people who do just what they like at the taxpayer's expense. 30 mil could get much needed staff back to run things properly. I'd like to see them try and work at the Civic and get stressed on the pc's technology for technologies sake - some of them are over 80 and don't have a clue

Olivia2847 says...
9:07pm Fri 2 Nov 12

Thirty million seems/is an extortionate amount of money that seems to in the hands of people who haven't a clue .....

Max Impact says...
4:43pm Sat 3 Nov 12

Unions... The echo do not permit expletives so can't say what I really think of the leaders but think lady gardens.

The hard grafting workers loose pay when on strike, the leaders do not, the leaders take home six figure pay packets, have funded homes and cars the works have to pay for it themselves.

Say one thing against your union and they cut you adrift, life has been much better since and U don't fund the lavish lifestyle of the leaders anymore, sort my own pay rise and other work changes, its worth looking at doing it yourselves.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree